Literature DB >> 25987517

Replicating studies in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli.

Jacob Westfall1, Charles M Judd2, David A Kenny3.   

Abstract

In a direct replication, the typical goal is to reproduce a prior experimental result with a new but comparable sample of participants in a high-powered replication study. Often in psychology, the research to be replicated involves a sample of participants responding to a sample of stimuli. In replicating such studies, we argue that the same criteria should be used in sampling stimuli as are used in sampling participants. Namely, a new but comparable sample of stimuli should be used to ensure that the original results are not due to idiosyncrasies of the original stimulus sample, and the stimulus sample must often be enlarged to ensure high statistical power. In support of the latter point, we discuss the fact that in experiments involving samples of stimuli, statistical power typically does not approach 1 as the number of participants goes to infinity. As an example of the importance of sampling new stimuli, we discuss the bygone literature on the risky shift phenomenon, which was almost entirely based on a single stimulus sample that was later discovered to be highly unrepresentative. We discuss the use of both resampled and expanded stimulus sets, that is, stimulus samples that include the original stimuli plus new stimuli.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  replication; statistical power; stimulus sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25987517     DOI: 10.1177/1745691614564879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  9 in total

Review 1.  Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging.

Authors:  Choong-Wan Woo; Luke J Chang; Martin A Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The spatial grounding of politics.

Authors:  Margarida V Garrido; Ana R Farias; Oleksandr V Horchak; Gün R Semin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-13

3.  The role of interest in memory for trivia questions: An investigation with a large-scale database.

Authors:  Greta M Fastrich; Tyson Kerr; Alan D Castel; Kou Murayama
Journal:  Motiv Sci       Date:  2017-12-18

4.  The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes.

Authors:  Damien L Crone; Stefan Bode; Carsten Murawski; Simon M Laham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The "I" in us, or the eye on us? Regulatory focus, commitment and derogation of an attractive alternative person.

Authors:  David Rodrigues; Diniz Lopes; Madoka Kumashiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Lure of Counterfactual Curiosity: People Incur a Cost to Experience Regret.

Authors:  Lily FitzGibbon; Asuka Komiya; Kou Murayama
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-01-13

7.  Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?

Authors:  Saoirse Connor Desai; Stian Reimers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-09-20

8.  Effect of age on discrimination learning, reversal learning, and cognitive bias in family dogs.

Authors:  Patrizia Piotti; Dóra Szabó; Zsófia Bognár; Anna Egerer; Petrouchka Hulsbosch; Rachel Sophia Carson; Enikő Kubinyi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions.

Authors:  Elisabeth Vogl; Reinhard Pekrun; Kou Murayama; Kristina Loderer; Sandra Schubert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.