OBJECTIVE: The timing of surgical correction of mitral regurgitation remains controversial. A major source of dispute regards the potential short- and long-term postoperative outcome penalty associated with the type of guideline-based indication for surgery. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2000, 1512 patients (aged 64 ± 14 years, mitral prolapse in 89%, valve repair in 88%) underwent surgical correction of pure organic mitral regurgitation. Patients were stratified according to surgical indication into class I triggers (ClassI-T: heart failure symptoms, ejection fraction <60%, end-systolic diameter ≥40 mm, n = 794), class II triggers based on clinical complications (ClassII-CompT: atrial fibrillation or pulmonary hypertension, n = 195), or early class II triggers based on a combination of severe mitral regurgitation and high probability of valve repair (ClassII-EarlyT: n = 523). RESULTS: Operative mortality was highest with ClassI-T (1.1% vs 0% and 0%, P = .016). Long-term survival was lower with ClassI-T (15-year 42% ± 2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-2.34; P < .0001) and ClassII-CompT (15-year 53% ± 4%, adjusted HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04-1.84; P = .027) versus ClassII-EarlyT (15-year 70% ± 3%, P < .0001). Postoperative excess mortality with ClassI-T and ClassII-CompT was confirmed by age stratification, inverse probability weighting, and expected survival adjustment. Excess postoperative heart failure was high with ClassI-T (adjusted HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.82-3.47; P < .0001) and ClassII-CompT (adjusted HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.30-3.00; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The type of guideline-based indication for surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation is associated with profound outcome consequences on long-term postoperative mortality and heart failure, despite low operative risk and high repair rates. Conversely, surgical correction of severe mitral regurgitation based on high probability of repair (ClassII-EarlyT) is associated with improved survival and low heart failure risk and should be the preferred strategy in valve centers offering low operative risk and high repair rates.
OBJECTIVE: The timing of surgical correction of mitral regurgitation remains controversial. A major source of dispute regards the potential short- and long-term postoperative outcome penalty associated with the type of guideline-based indication for surgery. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2000, 1512 patients (aged 64 ± 14 years, mitral prolapse in 89%, valve repair in 88%) underwent surgical correction of pure organic mitral regurgitation. Patients were stratified according to surgical indication into class I triggers (ClassI-T: heart failure symptoms, ejection fraction <60%, end-systolic diameter ≥40 mm, n = 794), class II triggers based on clinical complications (ClassII-CompT: atrial fibrillation or pulmonary hypertension, n = 195), or early class II triggers based on a combination of severe mitral regurgitation and high probability of valve repair (ClassII-EarlyT: n = 523). RESULTS: Operative mortality was highest with ClassI-T (1.1% vs 0% and 0%, P = .016). Long-term survival was lower with ClassI-T (15-year 42% ± 2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-2.34; P < .0001) and ClassII-CompT (15-year 53% ± 4%, adjusted HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04-1.84; P = .027) versus ClassII-EarlyT (15-year 70% ± 3%, P < .0001). Postoperative excess mortality with ClassI-T and ClassII-CompT was confirmed by age stratification, inverse probability weighting, and expected survival adjustment. Excess postoperative heart failure was high with ClassI-T (adjusted HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.82-3.47; P < .0001) and ClassII-CompT (adjusted HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.30-3.00; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The type of guideline-based indication for surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation is associated with profound outcome consequences on long-term postoperative mortality and heart failure, despite low operative risk and high repair rates. Conversely, surgical correction of severe mitral regurgitation based on high probability of repair (ClassII-EarlyT) is associated with improved survival and low heart failure risk and should be the preferred strategy in valve centers offering low operative risk and high repair rates.
Authors: Danai Kitkungvan; Eric Y Yang; Kinan C El Tallawi; Sherif F Nagueh; Faisal Nabi; Mohammad A Khan; Duc T Nguyen; Edward A Graviss; Gerald M Lawrie; William A Zoghbi; Robert O Bonow; Miguel A Quinones; Dipan J Shah Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Neil K Mehta; Jiwon Kim; Jonathan Y Siden; Sara Rodriguez-Diego; Javid Alakbarli; Antonino Di Franco; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Benjamin Essayagh; Giovanni Benfari; Clémence Antoine; Joseph Maalouf; Sorin Pislaru; Prabin Thapa; Hector I Michelena; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Mustafa I Ahmed; Jason L Guichard; Rajasekaran Namakkal Soorappan; Shama Ahmad; Nithya Mariappan; Silvio Litovsky; Himanshu Gupta; Steven G Lloyd; Thomas S Denney; Pamela Cox Powell; Inmaculada Aban; James Collawn; James E Davies; David C McGiffin; Louis J Dell'Italia Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2016-06-25 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Boyang Liu; Nicola C Edwards; Desley A H Neal; Christopher Weston; Gerard Nash; Nicolas Nikolaidis; Thomas Barker; Ramesh Patel; Moninder Bhabra; Richard P Steeds Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 2.298