Badr AbdullGaffar1, Lakshmiah Raman2, Ali Khamas3, Faisal AlBadri3. 1. Pathology Section, Rashid Hospital, Oud Metha Road, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. badraah009@yahoo.com. 2. Histopathology Unit, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. 3. Surgery Unit, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relatively new bariatric surgical procedure to reduce weight in morbidly obese patients, with an overall low rate of complications and thus gaining a worldwide popularity. It provides an opportunity to study the pathology of the stomach in obese patients. Most studies, however, focused on clinical aspects, surgical techniques, and postoperative complications. Few authors studied the histopathologic findings. Whether routine histopathologic examination is warranted in patients with grossly unremarkable LSG specimens and nonsignificant clinical history was not previously studied. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study over 8 years to compare the prevalence, the morphologic spectrum and importance of histopathologic findings, and the frequency of incidental neoplasms in LSG specimens with other studies. We also proposed a protocol for the gross handling and sectioning of LSG specimens. RESULTS: We found 546 LSG specimens. Five patients developed iatrogenic postoperative complications, two of which pursued a medicolegal case. There was no association between the histopathologic findings and the complications. Less than 1 % of incidental benign lesions were found. No malignancies were identified. All of the patients without postoperative complications had uneventful outcome after 5 months to 6 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Routine microscopic examination of all LSG specimens is not necessary. Selective microscopic examination guided by relevant clinical history and macroscopic examination is a better option. This protocol will save money, time, and workload without compromising patient's safety and future management. However, a careful gross description is still necessary in certain cases for potential future medicolegal implications.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relatively new bariatric surgical procedure to reduce weight in morbidly obesepatients, with an overall low rate of complications and thus gaining a worldwide popularity. It provides an opportunity to study the pathology of the stomach in obesepatients. Most studies, however, focused on clinical aspects, surgical techniques, and postoperative complications. Few authors studied the histopathologic findings. Whether routine histopathologic examination is warranted in patients with grossly unremarkable LSG specimens and nonsignificant clinical history was not previously studied. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study over 8 years to compare the prevalence, the morphologic spectrum and importance of histopathologic findings, and the frequency of incidental neoplasms in LSG specimens with other studies. We also proposed a protocol for the gross handling and sectioning of LSG specimens. RESULTS: We found 546 LSG specimens. Five patients developed iatrogenic postoperative complications, two of which pursued a medicolegal case. There was no association between the histopathologic findings and the complications. Less than 1 % of incidental benign lesions were found. No malignancies were identified. All of the patients without postoperative complications had uneventful outcome after 5 months to 6 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Routine microscopic examination of all LSG specimens is not necessary. Selective microscopic examination guided by relevant clinical history and macroscopic examination is a better option. This protocol will save money, time, and workload without compromising patient's safety and future management. However, a careful gross description is still necessary in certain cases for potential future medicolegal implications.
Authors: Vance Y Sohn; Zachary M Arthurs; Matthew J Martin; James A Sebesta; James B Branch; Anne L Champeaux Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: M Martín; M A Burrell; J Gómez-Ambrosi; V Valentí; Á Bueno; B Ramírez; S Becerril; A Lancha; P del Sol Calderón; L Méndez-Giménez; V Catalán; A Rodríguez; S Fernández; M Muñoz-Navas; J A Cienfuegos; G Frühbeck Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Marcelo A Beltran; Blazenko Pujado; Pedro E Méndez; Francisco J Gonzáles; David I Margulis; Mario A Contreras; Karina S Cruces Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2009-10-18 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Li Ge; Rena C Moon; Ha Nguyen; Luiz Gustavo de Quadros; Andre F Teixeira; Muhammad A Jawad Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 4.584