Literature DB >> 25986030

Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Christhardt Köhler1, Alexander Mustea2, Simone Marnitz3, Achim Schneider4, Vito Chiantera5, Uwe Ulrich6, Jens-Peter Scharf7, Peter Martus8, Marcelo Andrade Vieira9, Audrey Tsunoda10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging for cervical cancer is based on clinical examination. Previous studies have demonstrated significant upstaging with surgical staging. However, no randomized trial has ever shown a survival benefit when radiation combined with chemoradiation (RCTX) is modified according to surgical staging. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of surgical staging prior to radical RCTX treatment among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in the setting of a larger, prospective, randomized study (the Uterus-11 study of the German Gynecologic Oncology Group). STUDY
DESIGN: Between 2009 and 2013, 255 patients with advanced cervical cancer (FIGO IIB-IVA) were randomized to surgical staging and RCTX (arm A) or RCTX (arm B). RCTX in both arms included pelvic external beam radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) and brachytherapy. Extended-field radiation was performed in cases of confirmed paraaortic metastases.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients were randomized to surgical staging; 121 were eligible for this analysis. The mean patient age was 47.2 years, and the mean body mass index was 26.2 kg/m(2); the FIGO stages were IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA in 85 (70.2%), 4 (3.3%), 29 (24%), and 3 (2.5%) patients, respectively. Arm A and arm B were similar with respect to Karnofsky performance status, histology, comorbidities, and lymphovascular space involvement. The surgical approach was transperitoneal laparoscopy in nearly all patients (93.4%), with no operative mortality. One patient (0.8%) had a conversion to laparotomy; 2 patients had more than 500 mL blood loss; the early postoperative complication rate was 7.3%. A mean of 19 pelvic and 17 paraaortic nodes were removed, with means of 2.4 and 1.3 positive nodes, respectively. RCTX began between 7 and 21 days after surgery. Operative staging led to upstaging in 40 of 121 (33%).
CONCLUSION: Surgical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is safe and does not delay primary RCTX in a randomized study.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopic staging; locally advanced cervical cancer; operative morbidity; randomized trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25986030     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

1.  [Substantial advantage of CT-planned HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients compared to a historical series with regard to local control and toxicity?]

Authors:  Simone Marnitz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Does para-aortic irradiation reduce the risk of distant metastasis in advanced cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucas Gomes Sapienza; Maria José Leite Gomes; Vinicius Fernando Calsavara; Mario M Leitao; Glauco Baiocchi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic-Assisted Aortic Lymph-Nodal Staging for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mariano Catello Di Donna; Vincenzo Giallombardo; Giuseppina Lo Balbo; Giuseppe Cucinella; Giulio Sozzi; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Antonino Abbate; Antonio Simone Laganà; Simone Garzon; Vito Chiantera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Surgical Staging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Current Status and Research Progress.

Authors:  He Zhang; Weimin Kong; Shuning Chen; Xiaoling Zhao; Dan Luo; Yunkai Xie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 5.  The value of advanced MRI techniques in the assessment of cervical cancer: a review.

Authors:  Evelyn Dappa; Tania Elger; Annette Hasenburg; Christoph Düber; Marco J Battista; Andreas M Hötker
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-08-21

6.  Feasibility of radical hysterectomy in women with FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer: an observation study of 10-year experience in a tertiary center.

Authors:  Lei Yuan; Jiaqi Guo; Xiaochun Zhang; Mo Chen; Congjian Xu; Liangqing Yao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The analysis of the long-term outcomes in elderly women treated for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Krzysztof Koper; Konrad Dziobek; Roman Makarewicz; Joanna Terlikiewicz; Magdalena Dutsch-Wicherek
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-31

8.  Therapeutic value of surgical paraaortic staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a multicenter cohort analysis from the FRANCOGYN study group.

Authors:  Yohann Dabi; Vanille Simon; Xavier Carcopino; Sofiane Bendifallah; Lobna Ouldamer; Vincent Lavoue; Geoffroy Canlorbe; Emilie Raimond; Charles Coutant; Olivier Graesslin; Pierre Collinet; Alexandre Bricou; Emile Daraï; Cyrille Huchon; Marcos Ballester; Bassam Haddad; Cyril Touboul
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Audrey Tieko Tsunoda; Peter Martus; Marcelo Vieira; Renato Jose Affonso Junior; João Nunes; Volker Budach; Hermann Hertel; Alexander Mustea; Jalid Sehouli; Jens-Peter Scharf; Uwe Ulrich; Andreas Ebert; Iris Piwonski; Christhardt Kohler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  The basic principles of oncologic surgery during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Christhardt Köhler; Achim Schneider; Simone Marnitz; Andrea Plaikner
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.