Literature DB >> 25985374

Biomechanical Analysis of Screws Versus K-Wires for Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures.

Ryne S Schlitz1, Joseph M Schwertz, Alan W Eberhardt, Shawn R Gilbert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Good outcomes have been described for pediatric lateral condyle fractures treated by open reduction and fixation using either screws or Kirschner wires (K-wires). No studies have compared the biomechanical properties of the 2 fixation methods. We hypothesized that screw fixation would be more biomechanically stable than K-wire fixation.
METHODS: Synthetic humerus models were used for biomechanical testing, following a previously published protocol. A miter saw was used to make an oblique cut to simulate a Milch type II fracture. Fractures were anatomically reduced and fixed with either 2 divergent 0.062-inch K-wires placed bicortically or a 4.0-mm lag screw placed obliquely (perpendicular to the fracture line). Specimens were then embedded in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement for testing. Mechanical testing using displacement control was performed applying compression or distraction from 0 to 1.5 mm at a rate of 0.5 mm/s for 10 cycles. The maximum force was calculated based on the maximum force averaged over the 10 cycles. Stiffness was calculated based on the slope of the force-displacement curve of the 10th cycle. A 2-sample t test was used to determine significant differences between the stiffness and maximum force comparing the K-wire and screw groups. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Stiffness and maximum force in tension testing were significantly greater with screw fixation compared with K-wire fixation. Testing in compression revealed statistically significant increased maximum force and a trend towards increased stiffness.
CONCLUSION: Screw fixation in a synthetic bone model of pediatric lateral condyle fractures (Milch type II) provides increased biomechanical stability of the construct as compared with K-wires. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If similar effects were seen in vivo, increased biomechanical stability with screw fixation could decrease the occurrence of complications such as loss of reduction and nonunion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25985374     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Fractures of the upper limbs in childhood and adolescence].

Authors:  P P Schmittenbecher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Open reduction of pediatric lateral condyle fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael D Eckhoff; Josh C Tadlock; Tyler C Nicholson; Matthew E Wells; EStephan J Garcia; Theresa A Hennessey
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-04-22

3.  Open Reduction and Pin Fixation of Pediatric Lateral Humeral Condylar Fractures.

Authors:  Julia Sanders; Rachel Y Goldstein
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2020-11-19

4.  Retrospective study of open reduction and internal fixation of lateral humeral condyle fractures with absorbable screws and absorbable sutures in children.

Authors:  Yuxi Su; Kai Chen; Jiaqiang Qin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Cannulated screw versus Kirschner-wire fixation for Milch II lateral condyle fractures in a paediatric sawbone model: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  D Franks; J Shatrov; M Symes; D G Little; T L Cheng
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Biodegradable pins for lateral condylar fracture of the humerus with an early delayed presentation in children: a retrospective study of biodegradable pin vs. Kirschner wire.

Authors:  Jin Li; Saroj Rai; Yun Gao; Renhao Ze; Xin Tang; Ruikang Liu; Pan Hong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.