Literature DB >> 25984988

Informed Decision Making for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Disease.

Michael B Rothberg1, Senthil K Sivalingam2, Reva Kleppel3, Marc Schweiger4, Bo Hu5, Karen R Sepucha6.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Patients with stable coronary disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are frequently misinformed about the benefits of PCI. Little is known about the quality of decision making before angiography and possible PCI.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of informed decision making and its association with patient decisions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of recorded conversations between August 1, 2008, and August 31, 2012, among adults with known or suspected stable coronary disease at outpatient cardiology practices. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Presence of 7 elements of informed decision making and the decision to undergo angiography and possible PCI.
RESULTS: Of 59 conversations conducted by 23 cardiologists, 2 (3%) included all 7 elements of informed decision making; 8 (14%) met a more limited definition of procedure, alternatives, and risks. Specific elements significantly associated with not choosing angiography and possible PCI included discussion of uncertainty (odds ratio [OR], 20.5; 95% CI, 2.3-204.9), patient's role (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.3-21.3), exploration of alternatives (OR, 9.5; 95% CI, 2.5-36.5), and exploration of patient preference (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.2-19.4). Neither the presence of angina nor severity of symptoms was associated with choosing angiography and possible PCI. In a multivariable analysis using the total number of elements as a predictor, better informed patients were less likely to choose angiography and possible PCI (OR per additional element, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.4-7.1; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In conversations between cardiologists and patients with stable angina, informed decision making is often incomplete. More complete discussions are associated with patients choosing not to undergo angiography and possible PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25984988     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  8 in total

1.  Identifying patients with refusal of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Manyan Wu; Long Li; Sufang Li; Yuxia Cui; Dan Hu; Junxian Song; Chongyou Lee; Hong Chen
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  An Evidence-Based Medicine Approach to Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus to Overcome Overtreatment.

Authors:  Anil N Makam; Oanh K Nguyen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Medical Therapy With Versus Without Revascularization in Stable Patients With Moderate and Severe Ischemia: The Case for Community Equipoise.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Judith S Hochman; David O Williams; William E Boden; T Bruce Ferguson; Robert A Harrington; David J Maron
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Is Better Patient Knowledge Associated with Different Treatment Preferences? A Survey of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Neal Yuan; Christy Boscardin; Nadra E Lisha; R Adams Dudley; Grace A Lin
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients: Different Practice Patterns in Everyday Clinical Situations.

Authors:  Alexander E Berezin
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 6.  Addressing overuse in emergency medicine: evidence of a role for greater patient engagement.

Authors:  Erika H Newton
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-30

7.  Informed consent, shared-decision making and a reasonable patient's wishes based on a cross-sectional, national survey in the USA using a hypothetical scenario.

Authors:  John T James; Darwin Jay Eakins; Robert R Scully
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Patient Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  M Pilar Ingle; William Lammons; Rebecca Guigli; Vinay Kini; Daniel D Matlock; Elinor Brereton; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.