Literature DB >> 25984587

In the working memory of the beholder: Art appreciation is enhanced when visual complexity is compatible with working memory.

Aleksandra Sherman1, Marcia Grabowecky2, Satoru Suzuki2.   

Abstract

What shapes art appreciation? Much research has focused on the importance of visual features themselves (e.g., symmetry, natural scene statistics) and of the viewer's experience and expertise with specific artworks. However, even after taking these factors into account, there are considerable individual differences in art preferences. Our new result suggests that art preference is also influenced by the compatibility between visual properties and the characteristics of the viewer's visual system. Specifically, we have demonstrated, using 120 artworks from diverse periods, cultures, genres, and styles, that art appreciation is increased when the level of visual complexity within an artwork is compatible with the viewer's visual working memory capacity. The result highlights the importance of the interaction between visual features and the beholder's general visual capacity in shaping art appreciation. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25984587      PMCID: PMC4556127          DOI: 10.1037/a0039314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Parieto-frontal interactions in visual-object and visual-spatial working memory: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  M Oliveri; P Turriziani; G A Carlesimo; G Koch; F Tomaiuolo; M Panella; C Caltagirone
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Stirring images: fear, not happiness or arousal, makes art more sublime.

Authors:  Kendall J Eskine; Natalie A Kacinik; Jesse J Prinz
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-02-06

Review 3.  Neural plasticity in the ageing brain.

Authors:  Sara N Burke; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities.

Authors:  Daniel J Graham; David J Field
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2007

5.  The aesthetics of simple figures.

Authors:  I C McManus
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1980-11

Review 6.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Natural scene categories revealed in distributed patterns of activity in the human brain.

Authors:  Dirk B Walther; Eamon Caddigan; Li Fei-Fei; Diane M Beck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-04

9.  Measuring visual clutter.

Authors:  Ruth Rosenholtz; Yuanzhen Li; Lisa Nakano
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Aesthetic response to color combinations: preference, harmony, and similarity.

Authors:  Karen B Schloss; Stephen E Palmer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Does Amount of Information Support Aesthetic Values?

Authors:  Norberto M Grzywacz; Hassan Aleem
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Parenting Competence among Israeli Male Veterans: The Mediating Roles of Experiential Avoidance and Parental Reflective Functioning.

Authors:  Gadi Zerach
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 3.  What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sherman; Clair Morrissey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.