Literature DB >> 25984200

A pseudo-dominant form of Gitelman's syndrome.

Renaud de La Faille1, Marion Vallet1, Annabelle Venisse2, Valérie Nau2, Carole Collet-Gaudillat3, Pascal Houillier1, Xavier Jeunemaitre4, Rosa Vargas-Poussou5.   

Abstract

Gitelman's syndrome is an autosomal recessive salt losing nephropathy caused by inactivated mutations of the SLC12A3 gene, encoding the NaCl cotransporter of the distal convoluted tubule. We report a French family with five affected members over two generations suggesting a dominant transmission. After SLC12A3 sequencing of seven individuals, four mutations were detected. Pseudo-dominant transmission was explained by the union of a compound heterozygous woman (two mutations on one allele and one mutation on the other) with a heterozygous healthy man. This study shows the importance of complete genetic analysis of families with unusual presentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gitelman syndrome; mutation in cis; mutation in trans; pseudo-dominant inheritance

Year:  2011        PMID: 25984200      PMCID: PMC4421668          DOI: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfr094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NDT Plus        ISSN: 1753-0784


Background

Gitelman’s syndrome (GS; OMIM 263800) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by a defect in renal tubular sodium reabsorption with secondary hyperaldosteronism, renal hypokalaemia metabolic alkalosis, hypomagnesaemia and hypocalciuria [1]. GS results from inactivated mutations of the SLC12A3 gene, encoding the NaCl cotransporter of the distal convoluted tubule [2]. Most subjects carry two different heterozygous mutations inherited from each parent. Estimated prevalence of GS and of heterozygous carriers is ∼1/40 000 and 1/100 in the Caucasian population [3]. We report phenotypic and genotypic data of a French family with two unusual features: five members affected over two generations and the presence of four different mutations.

Case report

A 20-year-old man (Patient II.2, Figure 1) was referred for severe hypokalaemia (2 mmol/L) with hypomagnesaemia discovered 2 months before. He reported cramps, episodes of tetany and weakness. He had no past medical history, particularly, no prematurity or growth retardation. He was treated with potassium and magnesium supplementation. Normal blood pressure, orthostatic tachycardia, hyper-reninaemic hyperaldosteronism, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, metabolic alkalosis and high urinary excretion of NaCl, K and Mg were confirmed. There was no polyuria or hypercalciuria.
Fig. 1.

Family tree illustrating the transmission of GS over two generations. Sequencing chromatograms and segregation of the four detected mutations in the SLC12A3 gene are shown. Affected subjects are represented by dark symbols. The index patient is II.2. Mutations c and d are on the same allele.

Family tree illustrating the transmission of GS over two generations. Sequencing chromatograms and segregation of the four detected mutations in the SLC12A3 gene are shown. Affected subjects are represented by dark symbols. The index patient is II.2. Mutations c and d are on the same allele. Familial history of hypokalaemia was present in his mother, his maternal aunt and one of his maternal uncles. We first investigated his mother and then five other family members. Clinical and biochemical data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.

Clinical and biological data of the five GS patients and the two heterozygous carriers

StandardsII-2 (proband)II-1 (affected sister)II-3 (unaffected sister)I-1 (affected uncle)I-2 (father)I-3 (mother)I-4 (affected aunt)
Age, years20241952525141
Age at hypokalaemiadetection, years2024424721
Medical history and symptomsCramps, tetany and weaknessTetany and weaknessFaintness and tetany at 42HypertensionPre-term, generalized seizures at 31 and 41, transient right hemiparesis at 47. Normal pregnanciesGeneralized seizures
Treatment (dose/day)
Potassium50 mmol90 mmol100 mmol70 mmol40 mmol
Magnesium15 mmol10 mmol5.5 mmol
Spironolactone100 mg
Recumbent blood pressure, mmHg (cardiac frequency, bpm)112/55 (46)105/53 (52)119/68 (55)132/78 (47)114/60 (59)110/60 (72)
Standing blood pressure, mmHg (cardiac frequency, b.p.m.)110/54 (115)118/63 (93)87/43 (66)136/84 (52)116/63 (79)63/37 (106)
Plasma parameters
Sodium, mmol/L135–145140140137138140139137
Potassium, mmol/L3.5–4.52.62.43.4a 2.54.32.22.5
Chloride, mmol/L95–1059499101921039594
Bicarbonate, mmol/L22–2733292637293536
Magnesium, mmol/L0.64–0.900.520.620.900.490.870.580.64
Standing renin, mU/L15–50272197133124104
Standing aldosterone, pmol/L208–100094319611488596917
Urine parameters
Urine volume, L/24 h2.010.761.932.001.99
Sodium, mmol/24 h<10 if NaCl depletion258123245168247
Potassium, mmol/24 h<20 if K depletion11987179132127
Chloride, mmol/24 h<10 if NaCl depletion286106345251324
Magnesium, mmol/24 h<1 if Mg depletion2.90.76.23.82.1
Calcium, mmol/24 hMan <7.5, woman <6.252.50.15.83.83.4
Creatinine mmol/kg/dayMen 0.17–0.23, women 0.12–0.190.280.170.170.120.11

Plasma potassium concentration 1 year before was normal.

Clinical and biological data of the five GS patients and the two heterozygous carriers Plasma potassium concentration 1 year before was normal. The phenotypes of Patients I.1, I.3, I.4, II.1 and II.2 were similar and strongly suggested GS. Genetic investigations were performed after patients’ informed consent was obtained. DNA was extracted from blood leucocytes by standard procedures. Mutation analysis was performed by polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing of the SLC12A3 gene, as previously described [4]. Molecular genetic analysis showed the following results (Figure 1). The proband (Patient II.2) was compound heterozygous for one frameshift mutation in exon 10 (c.1196_1202dup, p.Ser402X, mutation a) and one splice-site mutation in intron 23 (c.2747 + 1G > A, mutation b). For his mother (Patient I.3), we first analysed Exons 10 and 23 but only mutation b was detected. Analysis of the remaining exons revealed two additional mutations: one frameshift mutation in Exon 14 (c.1805_1806del, p.Tyr602CysfsX31, mutation c) and another splice mutation in intron 22 (c.2660 + 1G > A, mutation d). Patients I.1 and I.4 carried the same three mutations as Patient I.3. Thus, Patient II.1 carried heterozygous mutations a, c and d. The healthy father (Patient I.2) was heterozygous for mutation a, and the healthy sister (Patient II.3) was heterozygous for mutations c and d. From these results, we deduced that mutations c and d were on the same allele (i.e. in cis) (Figure 1). Mutations a and c have been previously described [5, 6]. Mutation b has been detected only in the proband of this family in our cohort [4] and finally, this is the first description of mutation d. We did not perform RNA analysis, but mutation d was not detected in 200 normal chromosomes and four different bioinformatic methods integrated in the Alamut V.2 software predict a loss of donor splice-site (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France; http://www.interactivebiosoftware.com/).

Discussion

We report a French non-consanguineous family with apparent autosomal-dominant transmission of GS with five cases over two generations. Direct SLC12A3 sequencing has allowed us to show that the dominant-like transmission of the disease was explained by the union of a compound heterozygous woman, carrying two mutations on one allele and another mutation on the other, with a healthy man heterozygous for the mutation p.Ser402X. Consequently, the proband and his affected sister differed by the allele transmitted by their mother. An apparent dominant transmission of GS has been previously reported. Bettinelli et al. [7] in 1995 hypothesized that two different genetic transmissions of GS exist, autosomal recessive or autosomal dominant. Subsequently, the molecular analysis of the family described by Bettinelli et al. and another similar family showed that the affected parent was compound heterozygous with two distinct mutations and the other parent was heterozygous for a third mutation [5, 8]. It is well established that GS is transmitted as an autosomal recessive trait, and patients presenting typical GS phenotype are homozygous or compound heterozygous (i.e. bearing two pathogenic mutations in trans). The estimated prevalence of SLC12A3 heterozygous carriers is ∼1% [3]. Recently, this prevalence was estimated to 0.48% in unrelated subjects of the Framingham Heart study population [9]. Hence, in non-consanguineous families, the theoretical probability to have an affected child when one of the parents has GS is at least 1/200 and for a couple of one heterozygous carrier and one homozygous or compound heterozygous GS patient, as in the family described here, the probability to have an affected child is 50%. The four mutations detected in this family are two frameshift and two splice-site mutations probably resulting in unstable/abnormal messenger RNAs or truncated proteins. Interestingly, two of them are located on the same allele. In GS and other recessive diseases such as cystic fibrosis, two mutations on the same allele have been described; they are often missense mutations, which could be either a frequent not pathogenic variant or be functional and contribute to the phenotype severity [10-12]. Here, the two mutations detected on the same allele are pathogenic and rare. Indeed, in our cohort of 396 GS patients harbouring SLC12A3 mutations [4], mutation c was detected in only one other proband and for mutation d, it is the first ever description. This finding of triple pathogenic mutations appears to be a rare phenomenon (0.7% in our cohort) but illustrates the importance of sequencing all the exons for probands and parents to check the segregation and to determine if the mutations are located in cis or in trans. Otherwise, individuals with two mutations on the same allele, as sister II.3 in this family, could be wrongly considered as affected. In summary, complete phenotypic and genotypic characterization are critical to define autosomal recessive diseases with vertical transmission. The probability of a union between a GS-affected subject and a healthy heterozygous subject must be considered to provide accurate genetic advice.
  12 in total

1.  Spectrum of mutations in Gitelman syndrome.

Authors:  Rosa Vargas-Poussou; Karin Dahan; Diana Kahila; Annabelle Venisse; Eva Riveira-Munoz; Huguette Debaix; Bernard Grisart; Franck Bridoux; Robert Unwin; Bruno Moulin; Jean-Philippe Haymann; Marie-Christine Vantyghem; Claire Rigothier; Bertrand Dussol; Michel Godin; Hubert Nivet; Laurence Dubourg; Ivan Tack; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Pascal Houillier; Anne Blanchard; Olivier Devuyst; Xavier Jeunemaitre
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Linkage of Gitelman syndrome to the thiazide-sensitive sodium-chloride cotransporter gene with identification of mutations in Dutch families.

Authors:  H H Lemmink; L P van den Heuvel; H A van Dijk; G F Merkx; T J Smilde; P E Taschner; L A Monnens; S C Hebert; N V Knoers
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  A neutral variant involved in a complex CFTR allele contributes to a severe cystic fibrosis phenotype.

Authors:  Jérôme Clain; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; Emmanuelle Girodon; Joanna Lipecka; Aleksander Edelman; Michel Goossens; Pascale Fanen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Gitelman's variant of Bartter's syndrome, inherited hypokalaemic alkalosis, is caused by mutations in the thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter.

Authors:  D B Simon; C Nelson-Williams; M J Bia; D Ellison; F E Karet; A M Molina; I Vaara; F Iwata; H M Cushner; M Koolen; F J Gainza; H J Gitleman; R P Lifton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Genetic heterogeneity in tubular hypomagnesemia-hypokalemia with hypocalcuria (Gitelman's syndrome).

Authors:  A Bettinelli; M G Bianchetti; P Borella; E Volpini; M G Metta; E Basilico; A Selicorni; A Bargellini; M R Grassi
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Four novel mutations in the thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl co-transporter gene in Japanese patients with Gitelman's syndrome.

Authors:  Nobuki Maki; Atsushi Komatsuda; Hideki Wakui; Hiroshi Ohtani; Akihiko Kigawa; Namiko Aiba; Keiko Hamai; Mutsuhito Motegi; Akihiko Yamaguchi; Hirokazu Imai; Ken-ichi Sawada
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Novel molecular variants of the Na-Cl cotransporter gene are responsible for Gitelman syndrome.

Authors:  N Mastroianni; A Bettinelli; M Bianchetti; G Colussi; M De Fusco; F Sereni; A Ballabio; G Casari
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Rare independent mutations in renal salt handling genes contribute to blood pressure variation.

Authors:  Weizhen Ji; Jia Nee Foo; Brian J O'Roak; Hongyu Zhao; Martin G Larson; David B Simon; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Matthew W State; Daniel Levy; Richard P Lifton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 9.  Gitelman syndrome.

Authors:  Nine V A M Knoers; Elena N Levtchenko
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Are p.I148T, p.R74W and p.D1270N cystic fibrosis causing mutations?

Authors:  Mireille Claustres; Jean-Pierre Altiéri; Caroline Guittard; Carine Templin; Françoise Chevalier-Porst; Marie Des Georges
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  3 in total

1.  Two mutations in the thiazide-sensitive NaCl co-transporter gene in a Romanian Gitelman syndrome patient: case report.

Authors:  Cristina Gug; Adelina Mihaescu; Ioana Mozos
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Gitelman syndrome in a South African family presenting with hypokalaemia and unusual food cravings.

Authors:  Pieter Du Toit van der Merwe; Megan A Rensburg; William L Haylett; Soraya Bardien; M Razeen Davids
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Challenging Disease Ontology by Instances of Atypical PKHD1 and PKD1 Genetics.

Authors:  Jonathan de Fallois; Ria Schönauer; Johannes Münch; Mato Nagel; Bernt Popp; Jan Halbritter
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.