Literature DB >> 25984119

High-dose continuous venovenous hemofiltration combined with charcoal hemoperfusion for methotrexate removal.

Carrie Grafft1, Heidi Gunderson2, Loralie Langman3, Joseph C Farmer4, Nelson Leung1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 25984119      PMCID: PMC4421587          DOI: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfr002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NDT Plus        ISSN: 1753-0784


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Methotrexate (MTX) is used to treat various disorders and can be safely administered at high doses if renal function is adequate, high urine output (UOP) is maintained, urine is alkalinized and leucovorin rescue is given. Despite those measures, toxicity (mucositis, diarrhea, renal dysfunction and myelosuppression) occurs with prolonged high serum drug concentrations [1]. Dialysis-based methods of removal are largely ineffective because MTX is highly protein bound [1]. Use of charcoal hemoperfusion has also been reported but is minimally effective. We report the first case of high-dose continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) after charcoal hemofiltration for MTX removal in a patient with toxicity following lymphoma treatment.

Case report

A 64-year-old female with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma received MTX 8 g/m2 because her disease progressed despite multiple previous therapies. Although her renal and liver functions were adequate and she had received standard therapy to reduce MTX toxicity, it took 11 days for her serum MTX to reach a nontoxic level (<0.1 μmol/L). A second dose of MTX was given 30 days later. Her liver and kidney functions were again normal, and an alkaline high UOP was maintained prior to infusion to minimize toxicity. A higher than standard dose of leucovorin was also administered because of her previously prolonged serum MTX elevation. Unfortunately, 48 h after infusion, the serum MTX level was extremely high at 437.5 μmol/L. The patient developed stomatitis and thrombocytopenia, and her creatinine increased to 2 mg/dL (152.5 μmol/L) from 1.1 mg/dL (83.9 1 μmol/L). Besides the standard measures outlined earlier, a 4-h course of charcoal hemoperfusion was given followed by high-dose CVVH. The Prismaflex® system by Gambro was used for CVVH and run at 5 L/h (45 mL/kg/h) with half of the substitution fluid given both predilution and postdilution. The substitution fluid was high bicarbonate-containing PrismaSate® as prepackaged by Gambro to maintain urine alkalinization. To avoid alkalemia, the serum pH was monitored daily. To compensate for rapid leucovorin removal with CVVH, the patient received a 1200-mg bolus of leucovorin following charcoal hemoperfusion and a 500-mg/h maintenance infusion thereafter. The blood flow rate was 300 mL/min, and citrate was used for anticoagulation. After hemoperfusion, the MTX level decreased to 362 μmol/L. Over the next 8 h of CVVH alone, the serum MTX level dropped to 106 μmol/L and the effluent level was 57.7 μmol/L. Because of the rapid decline in MTX with CVVH, the flow rate was increased to 7.5 L/h (67 mL/kg/h) for 24 h but was later decreased back to 5 L/h (45 mL/kg/h) because of frequent filter clotting. After ∼96 h of CVVH, the MTX level was 3.55 μmol/L, but the rate of decline decreased. Another course of charcoal hemoperfusion was performed because of the decreased rate of MTX decline, but the MTX level did not decrease significantly. CVVH was reinitiated. After 7 days of CVVH, the serum MTX level decreased to 1.2 μmol/L. At that time, the effluent MTX was 0.7 μmol/L and the urinary MTX was 47.8 μmol/L. Because of the high urinary MTX as compared to the effluent, we felt that forced diuresis would be best for MTX removal and, therefore, CVVH was stopped. Her UOP increased to ∼200 mL/h from 75 mL/h with diuretics. However, after CVVH discontinuation, the serum MTX increased to 1.97 μmol/L over the next 24 h. CVVH was again reinitiated and the MTX level decreased to 0.53 μmol/L 11 days after CVVH was started. Comfort care measures were ultimately instituted because of the patient’s poor prognosis from lymphoma and MTX-related complications.

Discussion

By inhibiting dihydrofolate reductase and blocking de novo nucleotide synthesis, MTX is effective at treating many conditions. Unfortunately, a high serum concentration or prolonged exposure leads to life-threatening toxicity. Toxicity depends on dose, administration schedule and timing of leucovorin rescue. Plasma concentrations should be <1.0 μM 48 h after high-dose infusion. Plasma concentrations >10 μM at 48 h often leads to significant renal dysfunction and myelosuppression [1]. MTX and its metabolites are 90% renally excreted but poorly soluble at acidic pH. To enhance solubility, aggressive hydration and urine alkalinization are standard before and after high-dose infusion. Additionally, leucovorin is given, which restores the reduced folate pool and bypasses the blocked nucleotide synthesis pathway [2]. Standard therapy failed to improve MTX clearance in our case because of renal dysfunction. After prolonged and/or high-dose exposure, MTX and its metabolites precipitate in renal tubules causing direct toxicity worsening renal dysfunction and its clearance [1]. Intermittent hemodialysis, high-flux hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are ineffective at removing MTX because of its high protein binding (up to 80%), high volume of distribution and third-space compartment accumulation. Significant rebound of serum MTX also occurs with therapy discontinuation [1, 3, 4, 5]. Hemoperfusion has been used for MTX removal because it removes protein-bound substances from the blood [1]. The resin in the hemoperfusion cartridge has plasma proteins for drug absorption. Unfortunately, the cartridge can become saturated and adsorption or activation of coagulation factors has been observed. Thrombocytopenia and/or leucopenia can also occur [6]. A new agent, carboxypeptidase G2 (CPDG2) hydrolyzes glutamate residues from natural and synthetic folate analogs like MTX. This agent rapidly degrades MTX into the inactive metabolite 2,4-diamino-N 10-methoylpteroic acid (DAMPA) [7]. In a prospective, open-label nonrandomized trial, GPDG2 was given to patients with elevated MTX levels and renal dysfunction. Serum MTX decreased up to 94%, 30 min after administration. In another study, MTX levels rapidly decreased with GPDG2, but renal recovery and other outcomes were not improved when compared to traditional therapy [8]. Repeat dosing of CPDG2 can be ineffective because of antibody formation; and DAMPA, the inactive metabolite of MTX, may accumulate leading to persistent renal dysfunction [7, 8]. Further study of CPDG2 is needed. High-flow CVVH has a theoretical advantage over intermittent hemodialysis for MTX removal because it may prevent rebound of plasma drug levels. This modality is also safe in hemodynamically unstable patients like those with life-threatening intoxications [3]. Continuous renal replacement has been used to treat lithium, carbamazepine, valproic acid, metformin, salicylate and other poisonings [3]. One case of MTX removal with continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration alone has been previously reported [9]. MTX removal with combined intermittent hemodialysis and hemoperfusion has been reported [10]. In that case, a pediatric patient with a plasma MTX level of 300–400 μmol/L was treated with hemodialysis and hemoperfusion continuously for 16.5 h. Charcoal cartridges were replaced every 3–4 h. The MTX level decreased by 94% to 21 μmol/L with treatment but rapidly increased after discontinuation because of rebound [10]. We report the use of combined charcoal hemoperfusion and CVVH for MTX removal. Although charcoal hemoperfusion has been reported to remove MTX, we did not have that experience. The decline in serum MTX was not significantly different with hemoperfusion as compared to CVVH alone (Figure 1). Specifically, after the first 12 h of treatment (the first 4 h were with hemoperfusion combined with CVVH), the MTX concentration decreased by ∼75% as compared with 94% the second day of treatment without charcoal hemoperfusion. The second charcoal hemoperfusion treatment was also ineffective.
Fig. 1.

Decrease in MTX over 132 h of CVVH. A 4-h course of hemoperfusion was given at Hours 1–4 and approximately Hours 96–100.

Decrease in MTX over 132 h of CVVH. A 4-h course of hemoperfusion was given at Hours 1–4 and approximately Hours 96–100. As the serum MTX level decreased, it appeared that the removal rate decreased. The dramatic decline in MTX initially may have resulted from saturated protein-binding sites leaving a high proportion of free MTX easily removed with hemofiltration. It is unclear why hemoperfusion was relatively ineffective in our case. Perhaps after starting treatment, the largest proportion of serum MTX was nonprotein bound or the high MTX serum concentration quickly saturated the charcoal cartridge leaving it ineffective. After prolonged therapy, it seemed that minimal MTX was removed because the serum level did not significantly change. However, CVVH appeared useful because MTX was consistently in the effluent, and third-space compartments served as a constant reservoir. Furthermore, there was minimal rebound in serum MTX after CVVH discontinuation. If CVVH is used for MTX removal, high doses of leucovorin are needed to compensate for its rapid removal, and a high bicarbonate bath is needed for urine alkalinization. Experienced nursing and dialysis staff are essential for timely treatment and for troubleshooting problems with the CVVH machine. Despite rapid MTX removal with CVVH in our patient, the extremely high initial MTX level most likely caused irreversible damage. Although, our patient succumbed to lymphoma and MTX toxicity, high-dose CVVH was effective at removing high levels of MTX without significant complication. Our patient remained hemodynamically stable and maintained a high UOP further facilitating MTX removal.
  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of continuous renal replacement therapy in the treatment of poisoning.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Goodman; David S Goldfarb
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Understanding and managing methotrexate nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Brigitte C Widemann; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-06

3.  Acute renal failure after high-dose methotrexate therapy. Role of hemodialysis and plasma exchange in methotrexate removal.

Authors:  F X Thierry; I Vernier; J M Dueymes; H Roche; P Canal; F Meeus; J P Pourrat; J J Conté
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Removal of methotrexate by continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  P Jambou; J Levraut; C Favier; C Ichai; G Milano; D Grimaud
Journal:  Contrib Nephrol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.580

Review 5.  The pharmacology and clinical use of methotrexate.

Authors:  J Jolivet; K H Cowan; G A Curt; N J Clendeninn; B A Chabner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Removal of methotrexate, leucovorin, and their metabolites by combined hemodialysis and hemoperfusion.

Authors:  M V Relling; F B Stapleton; J Ochs; D P Jones; W Meyer; I W Wainer; W R Crom; C P McKay; W E Evans
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Use of charcoal hemoperfusion with sequential hemodialysis to reduce serum methotrexate levels in a patient with acute renal insufficiency.

Authors:  R Molina; C Fabian; B Cowley
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 8.  Extracorporeal treatment of intoxications.

Authors:  Anne-Cornélie J M de Pont
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.687

9.  Glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase g2) intervention in adult and elderly cancer patients with renal dysfunction and delayed methotrexate elimination after high-dose methotrexate therapy.

Authors:  Stefan Schwartz; Klaus Borner; Krystina Müller; Peter Martus; Lars Fischer; Agnieszka Korfel; Timothy Auton; Eckhard Thiel
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-11

10.  Carboxypeptidase G2 rescue in patients with methotrexate intoxication and renal failure.

Authors:  S Buchen; D Ngampolo; R G Melton; C Hasan; A Zoubek; G Henze; U Bode; G Fleischhack
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Extracorporeal Treatment for Methotrexate Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup.

Authors:  Marc Ghannoum; Darren M Roberts; David S Goldfarb; Jesper Heldrup; Kurt Anseeuw; Tais F Galvao; Thomas D Nolin; Robert S Hoffman; Valery Lavergne; Paul Meyers; Sophie Gosselin; Tudor Botnaru; Karine Mardini; David M Wood
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 10.614

2.  Methotrexate toxicity treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration, leucovorin and glucarpidase.

Authors:  Nicholas J Connors; Meghan E Sise; Lewis S Nelson; Robert S Hoffman; Silas W Smith
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 3.  Evaluation, Identification, and Management of Acute Methotrexate Toxicity in High-dose Methotrexate Administration in Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Doron Feinsilber; Roberto J Leoni; Duminda Siripala; Julianne Leuck; Katrina A Mears
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.