| Literature DB >> 25983969 |
Noritaka Onoda, Masafumi Fukagawa, Yoshihiro Tominaga, Masafumi Kitaoka, Tadao Akizawa, Fumihiko Koiwa, Takatoshi Kakuta, Kiyoshi Kurokawa.
Abstract
In 2000, the Japanese Society for Parathyroid Intervention issued the 'Guidelines for percutaneous ethanol injection therapy of the parathyroid glands in chronic dialysis patients'. Since then, the concept of 'selective PEIT' has been well accepted and the number of patients treated by this method in Japan has increased. Recently, it has been reported that the effect of PEIT differs depending on the degree of nodular hyperplasia. Several new drugs have become available since 2000, and active vitamin D and its analogue have also been used for direct injection into the parathyroids. We present the new 'Guidelines for selective direct injection therapy of the parathyroid glands in chronic dialysis patients', a revised version of the 2000 Guidelines. We believe that these new guidelines are useful for selecting direct injection therapy in patients with advanced secondary hyperparathyroidism.Entities:
Keywords: nodular hyperplasia; percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT); percutaneous vitamin D injection therapy (PDIT); secondary hyperparathyroidism; ultrasonography
Year: 2008 PMID: 25983969 PMCID: PMC4421126 DOI: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NDT Plus ISSN: 1753-0784
A new version of the clinical guidelines for selective direct injection therapy of the parathyroid glands in chronic dialysis patients
| 1. Therapy is indicated for those who meet all three of the following criteria: |
| (i) Difficult cases for continuous treatment, despite of medical treatments, showing intact PTH ≥ 400 pg/mla or hyperphosphataemia and/or |
| hypercalcaemia induced by treatmentb |
| (ii) Enlarged parathyroid glands with suspected nodular hyperplasiac on ultrasonographyd |
| (iii) Patients who have given informed consent to undergo PEITe |
| Exclusion criteria |
| (i) Enlarged parathyroid gland located where ultrasonographic-guided puncture is impossible |
| (ii) Paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve on the opposite sidef |
| (iii) Operation in the neck region for thyroid carcinoma, etc. is scheduled |
| 2. PEIT equipment and techniques |
| (i) Equipment: an electronic linear or convex ultrasound scan system with a frequency ≥7.5 MHz and colour Doppler function |
| (ii) Needles: ∼22 g, visible under ultrasonographic guidance (special needles for PEIT are commercially available) |
| (iii) Technique: advance the needle visually, using ultrasonographic guidance to check the location of the tip. Flush with a minimum amount |
| (0.02–0.1 ml) of ethanol, confirm jet echo within the gland, and then inject the required amount of ethanol. Adjust the amount of ethanol for |
| the initial injection to ≥80% of the estimated volume of the gland on ultrasonography. When an additional ethanol injection is needed, the |
| minimum amount should be injected into sites where there is blood flow |
| (iv) Complications: PEIT can cause pain, haematomas or paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, so it should be performed with care |
| 3. Post-PEIT management |
| (i) Following the procedure, administration of active vitamin D sterols and control of serum phosphorus and calcium concentration must be started. |
| The target i-PTH value should be between 60 and 180 pg/ml in the long term (intact PTH = 1–84 PTH × 1.7) |
| (ii) Indications for additional PEIT: if the PTH concentration measured 2–4 weeks after PEIT does not decrease to the target concentration, PEIT |
| should be repeated at a site with blood flow |
| (iii) Indications for further PEIT: if the PTH concentration increases again, ultrasonographic examination should be repeated. If increased blood |
| flow is seen in PEIT-treated glands, additional ethanol injections should be planned even if criterion (i) for initial PEIT is not satisfied |
| (iv) Consider discontinuing the PEIT procedure in a refractory case to avoid tissue adhesion due to the injected alcohol, a condition which may lead |
| to difficulty in subsequent parathyroidectomy (PTx) |
| (v) If the target gland has been completely destroyed and the PTH concentration is still elevated, diagnostic imaging for ectopic glands should |
| be carried |
| This procedure is administered at an ‘advanced medicine hospital’ approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The drugs used |
| for this purpose are calcitriol and maxacalcitol. The indications, techniques and post-injection management procedures are similar to those for |
| PEIT. The therapy differs from PEIT in the following points: |
| (i) Lower risk to the recurrent laryngeal nerves, but similar risk of tissue adhesion |
| (ii) Repeated injections are generally needed. If the PTH concentration increases again, consider switching to PEIT or PTx to avoid the risks |
| frequent injections |
aThe value of 1–84 PTH is converted to i-PTH by the formula: Intact PTH = 1–84 PTH × 1.7.
bPEIT can be considered in patients with concentrations of i-PTH < 400 pg/ml if hyperphosphataemia and/or hypercalcaemia is present.
cEstimated volume (calculated by length × width × depth × π/6) >0.5 cm3 or abundant blood flow inside the gland suggests nodular hyperplasia.
dIf two or more glands have progressed to nodular hyperplasia, PEIT will probably be ineffective in the long term.
eAn explanation of the importance of regular checkup, restricted diet and compliance after PEIT should be given to the patient before obtaining informed consent for the procedure.
fBecause the paralysis caused by ethanol results in diplegia of the recurrent laryngeal nerves, concurrent bilateral injection of ethanol should not be considered, even if there is no paralysis of either laryngeal nerve before PEIT.