| Literature DB >> 25983626 |
Doriane Picanço-Rodrigues1, Spartaco Astolfi-Filho1, Maristerra R Lemes2, Rogerio Gribel2, Alexandre M Sebbenn3, Charles R Clement4.
Abstract
Peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) is cultivated by many indigenous and traditional communities from Amazonia to Central America for its edible fruits, and is currently important for its heart-of-palm. The objective of this study was to investigate the mating system of peach palm, as this is important for conservation and breeding. Eight microsatellite loci were used to genotype 24 open-pollinated progenies from three populations of the Pampa Hermosa landrace maintained in a progeny trial for genetic improvement. Both the multi-locus outcrossing rates (0.95 to 0.99) and the progeny level multi-locus outcrossing rates (0.9 to 1.0) were high, indicating that peach palm is predominantly allogamous. The outcrossing rates among relatives were significantly different from zero (0.101 to 0.202), providing evidence for considerable biparental inbreeding within populations, probably due to farmers planting seeds of a small number of open-pollinated progenies in the same plot. The correlations of paternity estimates were low (0.051 to 0.112), suggesting a large number of pollen sources (9 to 20) participating in pollination of individual fruit bunches. Effective population size estimates suggest that current germplasm collections are insufficient for long-term ex situ conservation. As with most underutilized crops, on farm conservation is the most important component of an integrated conservation strategy.Entities:
Keywords: Bactris gasipaes; bi-parental inbreeding; genetic conservation; genetic improvement; outcrossing
Year: 2014 PMID: 25983626 PMCID: PMC4415557 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-475738120140022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Estimates of peach palm mating system parameters in progenies from populations cultivated along three rivers in the distribution of the Pampa Hermosa landrace, near Yurimaguas, Peru.
| Cuiparillo | Shanusi | Paranapura | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multilocus outcrossing
rate ( | z | ||
| Progeny 1 | 1.00 (0.00) - [12] | 1.00 (0.00) - [30] | 1.00 (0.00) - [10] |
| Progeny 2 | 0.95 (0.05) - [20] | 1.00 (0.00) - [27] | 0.92 (0.08) - [12] |
| Progeny 3 | 1.00 (0.00) - [14] | 1.00 (0.00) - [24] | 1.00 (000) - [12] |
| Progeny 4 | 1.00 (0.00) - [15] | 1.00 (0.00) - [17] | 1.00 (0.00) - [12] |
| Progeny 5 | 1.00 (0.00) - [12] | 1.00 (0.00) - [15] | 1.00 (0.00) - [25] |
| Progeny 6 | 0.92 (0.01) - [11] | 1.00 (0.00) - [10] | 1.00 (0.00) - [12] |
| Progeny 7 | 0.94 (0.05) - [16] | 0.90 (0.07) - [10] | 1.00 (0.00) - [10] |
| Progeny 8 | 1.00 (0.00) - [11] | 1.00 (0.00) - [12] | |
| Progeny 9 | 1.00 (0.00) - [10] | ||
| Mating system parameters in population level | |||
| Multilocus outcrossing
rate: | 0.95 (0.93–0.97) | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) |
| Single locus
outcrossing rate: | 0.85 (0.82–0.88) | 0.78 (0.74–0.82) | 0.88 (0.85–0.91) |
| Mating among relatives
rate: | 0.10 (0.08–0.12) | 0.20 (0.17–0.23) | 0.11 (0.08–0.14) |
| Correlation of the
estimate of | 0.07 (0.03–0.11) | 0.12 (0.10–0.14) | 0.08 (0.06–0.10) |
| Correlation of the
estimate of | 0.07 (0.05–0.09) | 0.11 (0.09–0.13) | 0.05 (0.03–0.07) |
| Correlation of selfing
among loci: | 0.56 (0.49–0.63) | 0.39 (0.32–0.46) | 0.63 (0.54–0.72) |
| Fraction of apparent
selfing due to biparental inbreeding: 1 - | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.34 |
| Number of pollen
donors: | 15.2 (11.1–33.3) | 9 (7.7–10.0) | 19.6 (14.3–16.7) |
| Coefficient of coancestry: Θ | 0.146 (0.139–0.154) | 0.144 (0.139–0.148) | 0.134 (0.129–0.139) |
| Variance effective
size: | 3.40 (3.25–3.61) | 3.48 (3.37–3.61) | 3.70 (3.60–3.88) |
| Total variance
effective size: | 30.6 (29.3–32.5) | 24.4 (23.6–25.2) | 29.6 (28.8–31.7) |
[ ] - number of plants in the progeny; () standard errors in the progeny or minimum-maximum in the population.