Literature DB >> 25983571

Difference between adolescent and collegiate baseball pitchers in the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs and trunk during pitching motion.

Masahiro Kageyama1, Takashi Sugiyama1, Hiroaki Kanehisa2, Akira Maeda2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to clarify the differences between adolescent and collegiate baseball pitchers in the kinematic and kinetic profiles of the trunk and lower limbs during the pitching motion. The subjects were thirty-two adolescent baseball pitchers aged 12-15 years (APG) and thirty collegiate baseball pitchers aged 18-22 years (CPG). Three-dimensional motion analysis with a comprehensive lower-extremity model was used to evaluate kinematic and kinetic parameters during baseball pitching. The ground reaction forces (GRFs) of the pivot and stride legs during pitching were determined using two multicomponent force plates. The joint torques of hip, knee, and ankle were calculated by the inverse-dynamics computation of musculoskeletal human models using motion-capture data. To eliminate any effect of variation in body size, kinetic and GRFs data were normalized by dividing them by body mass. The velocity of a pitched ball was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in CPG (35.2 ± 1.9 m·s(-1)) than in the APG (30.7 ± 2.7 m·s(-1)). Most kinematic parameters for the lower limbs were similar between the CPG and the APG. Maximum Fy (toward the throwing direction) on the pivot leg and Fy and resultant forces on the stride leg at ball release were significantly greater in the CPG than in the APG (p < 0.05). Hip and knee joint torques on the lower limbs were significantly greater in the CPG than in the APG (p < 0.05). The present study indicates that the kinematics of lower limbs during baseball pitching are similar between adolescent and collegiate pitchers, but the momentum of the lower limbs during pitching is lower in adolescent pitchers than in collegiate ones, even when the difference in body mass is considered. Key pointsCollegiate baseball pitchers can generate the hip and knee joint torques on the pivot leg for accelerating the body forward.Collegiate baseball pitchers can generate the hip and knee joint torques to control/stabilize the stride leg in order to increase momentum on the stride leg during the arm acceleration phase.The kinematics of the lower limbs during baseball pitching are similar between adolescent and collegiate pitchers, but the momentum of the lower limbs during pitching is lower in adolescent pitchers than in collegiate ones, even when the difference in body mass is considered.Adolescent baseball pitchers cannot generate the hip and knee joint torques in the pivot and stride leg for transfer of the energy of trunk and the arm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pitching ball velocity; ground-reaction force; joint moment; motion analysis; the open kinetic chain

Year:  2015        PMID: 25983571      PMCID: PMC4424451     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  12 in total

Review 1.  The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part I: pathoanatomy and biomechanics.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Craig D Morgan; W Ben Kibler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Adolescent baseball pitching technique: lower extremity biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Matthew D Milewski; Sylvia Õunpuu; Matthew Solomito; Melany Westwell; Carl W Nissen
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 1.833

3.  Lower extremity muscle activation during baseball pitching.

Authors:  Brian M Campbell; David F Stodden; Megan K Nixon
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Kinetic comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider in collegiate baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Glenn S Fleisig; David S Kingsley; Jeremy W Loftice; Kenneth P Dinnen; Rajiv Ranganathan; Shouchen Dun; Rafael F Escamilla; James R Andrews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  A biomechanical comparison of youth baseball pitches: is the curveball potentially harmful?

Authors:  Shouchen Dun; Jeremy Loftice; Glenn S Fleisig; David Kingsley; James R Andrews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

7.  Kinematic and Kinetic Profiles of Trunk and Lower Limbs during Baseball Pitching in Collegiate Pitchers.

Authors:  Masahiro Kageyama; Takashi Sugiyama; Yohei Takai; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Akira Maeda
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 8.  Biomechanics of overarm throwing movements and of throwing injuries.

Authors:  A E Atwater
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 6.230

9.  Passive ranges of motion of the hips and their relationship with pitching biomechanics and ball velocity in professional baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Andrew J Robb; Glenn Fleisig; Kevin Wilk; Leonard Macrina; Becky Bolt; Jason Pajaczkowski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Specificity and sensitivity of the anterior slide test in throwing athletes with superior glenoid labral tears.

Authors:  W B Kibler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  9 in total

1.  Relationships between Hip Flexibility and Pitching Biomechanics in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Maxwell L Albiero; Wesley Kokott; Cody Dziuk; Janelle A Cross
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.824

2.  Heterogeneous Spatial and Strength Adaptation of the Proximal Femur to Physical Activity: A Within-Subject Controlled Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Alyssa M Weatherholt; Joyce H Keyak; Chenxi Yan; Mariana E Kersh; Thomas F Lang; Robyn K Fuchs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Baseball and Softball Pitchers are Distinct Within-Subject Controlled Models for Exploring Proximal Femur Adaptation to Physical Activity.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; William R Thompson; Alyssa M Weatherholt; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Lower trunk muscle activity-induced alignment and cop position during single-leg standing.

Authors:  Tetsuya Nakao; Kenichi Masuda; Shigeyuki Kanai; Junzo Tsujita; Kazufumi Hirakawa; Shuichi Okada
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-06-07

5.  Knee Angle and Stride Length in Association with Ball Speed in Youth Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Bart van Trigt; Wouter Schallig; Erik van der Graaff; Marco J M Hoozemans; Dirkjan Veeger
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-29

6.  Biomechanical Differences Between Japanese and American Professional Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Takanori Oi; Shinichi Yoshiya; Jon Slowik; Alek Diffendaffer; Yohei Takagi; Hiroshi Tanaka; Katsuya Nobuhara; Glenn S Fleisig
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-19

7.  Analysis of lower extremity side-reaching motion in junior high school baseball players.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Endo; Masaaki Sakamoto
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2019-11-26

8.  A New Method for Evaluating Pelvic and Trunk Rotational Pitching Mechanics: From Qualitative to Quantitative Approaches.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Lin; Paul Pei-Hsi Chou; Hwai-Ting Lin; Chia-Lung Shih; Cheng-Chang Lu; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Changes in lower extremity function and pitching performance with increasing numbers of pitches in baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Osamu Yanagisawa; Hidenori Taniguchi
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2018-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.