INTRODUCTION: There is a need for specific measures to address overall care in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Physical resistance training (PRT) has been shown to improve certain body parameters. However, the effect of PRT on the sexual function of PCOS women has not been evaluated. AIM: The study aimed to assess sexual function and emotional status of PCOS women after 16 weeks of PRT. METHODS: This case-control study involved 43 women with PCOS and 51 control ovulatory women, aged 18-37 years. All women were subjected to a supervised PRT protocol for 16 weeks and evaluated at the end of the program. Sexual function was assessed at baseline and after PRT protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure used was the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). RESULTS: Of the 43 women with PCOS, 30 (69.70%) had a basal total FSFI score ≤ 26.55 and 24 of them (58.54%) had a score ≤ 26.55 after PRT (P = 0.08). Of the 51 control women, 32 (62.7%) and 27 (52.9%) had FSFI scores < 26.55 at baseline and after PRT, respectively (P = 0.06). Control women experienced a significant improvement in pain domain score after PRT (P < 0.03). PCOS women experienced significant increases in total score and in the desire, excitement and lubrication domains after PRT (P < 0.01 each). After PRT, there was a significant difference between the PCOS and control groups in the sexual desire domain (4.09 ± 1.29 vs. 3.75 ± 1.42, P = 0.04). Significantly fewer women in the PCOS group were at risk of depression (P < 0.01) and anxiety (P < 0.02) after than before PRT, whereas the differences in the control group were not significant. Mean depression and anxiety scores were reduced significantly in both the PCOS (P < 0.01 each) and control (P < 0.01) groups. CONCLUSIONS: PRT significantly enhanced total score and the desire, excitement, and lubrication domains of the FSFI in PCOS women. PRT reduced pain, and total depression and anxiety scores in both groups.
INTRODUCTION: There is a need for specific measures to address overall care in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Physical resistance training (PRT) has been shown to improve certain body parameters. However, the effect of PRT on the sexual function of PCOSwomen has not been evaluated. AIM: The study aimed to assess sexual function and emotional status of PCOSwomen after 16 weeks of PRT. METHODS: This case-control study involved 43 women with PCOS and 51 control ovulatory women, aged 18-37 years. All women were subjected to a supervised PRT protocol for 16 weeks and evaluated at the end of the program. Sexual function was assessed at baseline and after PRT protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure used was the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). RESULTS: Of the 43 women with PCOS, 30 (69.70%) had a basal total FSFI score ≤ 26.55 and 24 of them (58.54%) had a score ≤ 26.55 after PRT (P = 0.08). Of the 51 control women, 32 (62.7%) and 27 (52.9%) had FSFI scores < 26.55 at baseline and after PRT, respectively (P = 0.06). Control women experienced a significant improvement in pain domain score after PRT (P < 0.03). PCOSwomen experienced significant increases in total score and in the desire, excitement and lubrication domains after PRT (P < 0.01 each). After PRT, there was a significant difference between the PCOS and control groups in the sexual desire domain (4.09 ± 1.29 vs. 3.75 ± 1.42, P = 0.04). Significantly fewer women in the PCOS group were at risk of depression (P < 0.01) and anxiety (P < 0.02) after than before PRT, whereas the differences in the control group were not significant. Mean depression and anxiety scores were reduced significantly in both the PCOS (P < 0.01 each) and control (P < 0.01) groups. CONCLUSIONS: PRT significantly enhanced total score and the desire, excitement, and lubrication domains of the FSFI in PCOSwomen. PRT reduced pain, and total depression and anxiety scores in both groups.
Authors: Rhiannon K Patten; Michaela C Pascoe; Alba Moreno-Asso; Russell A Boyle; Nigel K Stepto; Alexandra G Parker Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Charles H Hubscher; April N Herrity; Carolyn S Williams; Lynnette R Montgomery; Andrea M Willhite; Claudia A Angeli; Susan J Harkema Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: María Del Carmen Carcelén-Fraile; Agustín Aibar-Almazán; Antonio Martínez-Amat; David Cruz-Díaz; Esther Díaz-Mohedo; María Teresa Redecillas-Peiró; Fidel Hita-Contreras Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 3.390