Literature DB >> 25981683

Structured Benefit-risk assessment: a review of key publications and initiatives on frameworks and methodologies.

Shahrul Mt-Isa1, Mario Ouwens2, Veronique Robert3, Martin Gebel4, Alexander Schacht5, Ian Hirsch6.   

Abstract

Introduction The conduct of structured benefit-risk assessment (BRA) of pharmaceutical products is a key area of interest for regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry. However, the acceptance of a standardized approach and implementation are slow. Statisticians play major roles in these organizations, and have a great opportunity to be involved and drive the shaping of future BRA. Method We performed a literature search of recent reviews and initiatives assessing BRA methodologies, and grouped them to assist those new to BRA in learning, understanding, and choosing methodologies. We summarized the key points and discussed the impact of this emerging field on various stakeholders, particularly statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry. Results We provide introductory, essential, special interest, and further information and initiatives materials that direct readers to the most relevant materials, which were published between 2000 and 2013.  Based on recommendations in these materials we supply a toolkit of advocated BRA methodologies. Discussion Despite initiatives promoting these methodologies, there are still barriers, one of which being the lack of a consensus on the most appropriate methodologies among stakeholders. However, this opens up opportunities, for statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry especially, to champion appropriate BRA methodology use throughout the pharmaceutical product lifecycle. Conclusions This article may serve as a starting point for discussions and to reach a mutual consensus for methodology selection in a particular situation. Regulators and pharmaceutical industry should continue to collaborate to develop and take forward BRA methodologies, and by clear communication develop a mutual understanding of the key issues.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  benefit-risk; pharmaceutical; regulatory; review; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25981683     DOI: 10.1002/pst.1690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  8 in total

Review 1.  Benefit-risk assessment and reporting in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Bethea A Kleykamp; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Zubin Bhagwagar; Penney Cowan; Christopher Eccleston; Susan S Ellenberg; Scott R Evans; John T Farrar; Roy L Freeman; Louis P Garrison; Jennifer S Gewandter; Veeraindar Goli; Smriti Iyengar; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; Roderick Junor; Nathaniel P Katz; J Patrick Kesslak; Ernest A Kopecky; Dmitri Lissin; John D Markman; Michael P McDermott; Philip J Mease; Alec B O'Connor; Kushang V Patel; Srinivasa N Raja; Michael C Rowbotham; Cristina Sampaio; Jasvinder A Singh; Ilona Steigerwald; Vibeke Strand; Leslie A Tive; Jeffrey Tobias; Ajay D Wasan; Hilary D Wilson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.926

2.  Benefit-risk assessment of paliperidone oral extended-release tablet versus monthly injectable for maintenance treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bennett Levitan; Michael Markowitz; Ibrahim Turkoz; Dong-Jing Fu; Srihari Gopal; Larry Alphs
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.659

3.  A novel measure of drug benefit-risk assessment based on Scale Loss Score.

Authors:  Gaelle Saint-Hilary; Veronique Robert; Mauro Gasparini; Thomas Jaki; Pavel Mozgunov
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 4.  Evaluating the Success of ZaZiBoNa, the Southern African Development Community Collaborative Medicines Registration Initiative.

Authors:  Tariro Sithole; Gugu Mahlangu; Sam Salek; Stuart Walker
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 1.778

5.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Benefit-Risk Analysis by National Regulatory Authorities.

Authors:  Orin Chisholm; Patrick Sharry; Lawrence Phillips
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-12

6.  Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccines. Part II: Proposal Towards Consolidated Standards of Reporting Quantitative Benefit-Risk Models Applied to Vaccines (BRIVAC).

Authors:  Hugo Arlegui; Kaatje Bollaerts; Vincent Bauchau; Gaëlle Nachbaur; Bernard Bégaud; Nicolas Praet
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccines. Part I: A Systematic Review to Identify and Describe Studies About Quantitative Benefit-Risk Models Applied to Vaccines.

Authors:  Hugo Arlegui; Kaatje Bollaerts; Francesco Salvo; Vincent Bauchau; Gaëlle Nachbaur; Bernard Bégaud; Nicolas Praet
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment: State of the Practice Within Industry.

Authors:  Meredith Y Smith; Janine van Til; Rachael L DiSantostefano; A Brett Hauber; Kevin Marsh
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 1.778

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.