Dustin C Frost1, Tyler Greer2, Feng Xiang1, Zhidan Liang1, Lingjun Li1,2. 1. School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, 1101 University Ave, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Relative quantification of proteins via their enzymatically digested peptide products determines disease biomarker candidate lists in discovery studies. Isobaric label-based strategies using TMT and iTRAQ allow for up to 10 samples to be multiplexed in one experiment, but their expense limits their use. The demand for cost-effective tagging reagents capable of multiplexing many samples led us to develop an 8-plex version of our isobaric labeling reagent, DiLeu. METHODS: The original 4-plex DiLeu reagent was extended to an 8-plex set by coupling isotopic variants of dimethylated leucine to an alanine balance group designed to offset the increasing mass of the label's reporter group. Tryptic peptides from a single protein digest, a protein mixture digest, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae lysate digest were labeled with 8-plex DiLeu and analyzed via nanospray liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC/MS(2) ) on a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Characteristics of 8-plex DiLeu-labeled peptides, including quantitative accuracy and fragmentation, were examined. RESULTS: An 8-plex set of DiLeu reagents with 1 Da spaced reporters was synthesized at a yield of 36%. The average cost to label eight 100 µg peptide samples was calculated to be approximately $15. Normalized collision energy tests on the Q-Exactive revealed that a higher-energy collisional dissociation value of 27 generated the optimum number of high-quality spectral matches. Relative quantification of DiLeu-labeled peptides yielded normalized median ratios accurate to within 12% of their expected values. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effective 8-plex DiLeu reagents can be synthesized and applied to relative peptide and protein quantification. These labels increase the multiplexing capacity of our previous 4-plex implementation without requiring high-resolution instrumentation to resolve reporter ion signals.
RATIONALE: Relative quantification of proteins via their enzymatically digested peptide products determines disease biomarker candidate lists in discovery studies. Isobaric label-based strategies using TMT and iTRAQ allow for up to 10 samples to be multiplexed in one experiment, but their expense limits their use. The demand for cost-effective tagging reagents capable of multiplexing many samples led us to develop an 8-plex version of our isobaric labeling reagent, DiLeu. METHODS: The original 4-plexDiLeu reagent was extended to an 8-plex set by coupling isotopic variants of dimethylated leucine to an alanine balance group designed to offset the increasing mass of the label's reporter group. Tryptic peptides from a single protein digest, a protein mixture digest, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae lysate digest were labeled with 8-plexDiLeu and analyzed via nanospray liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC/MS(2) ) on a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Characteristics of 8-plexDiLeu-labeled peptides, including quantitative accuracy and fragmentation, were examined. RESULTS: An 8-plex set of DiLeu reagents with 1 Da spaced reporters was synthesized at a yield of 36%. The average cost to label eight 100 µg peptide samples was calculated to be approximately $15. Normalized collision energy tests on the Q-Exactive revealed that a higher-energy collisional dissociation value of 27 generated the optimum number of high-quality spectral matches. Relative quantification of DiLeu-labeled peptides yielded normalized median ratios accurate to within 12% of their expected values. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effective 8-plex DiLeu reagents can be synthesized and applied to relative peptide and protein quantification. These labels increase the multiplexing capacity of our previous 4-plex implementation without requiring high-resolution instrumentation to resolve reporter ion signals.
Authors: Leroi DeSouza; Georg Diehl; Mary Joe Rodrigues; Jingzhong Guo; Alexander D Romaschin; Terence J Colgan; K W Michael Siu Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2005 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Alexander S Hebert; Anna E Merrill; Derek J Bailey; Amelia J Still; Michael S Westphall; Eric R Strieter; David J Pagliarini; Joshua J Coon Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2013-02-24 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Timothy W Rhoads; Christopher M Rose; Derek J Bailey; Nicholas M Riley; Rosalynn C Molden; Amelia J Nestler; Anna E Merrill; Lloyd M Smith; Alexander S Hebert; Michael S Westphall; David J Pagliarini; Benjamin A Garcia; Joshua J Coon Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Ling Hao; Jillian Johnson; Christopher B Lietz; Amanda Buchberger; Dustin Frost; W John Kao; Lingjun Li Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 6.986