Literature DB >> 25981411

Inferring the effects of potential dispersal routes on the metacommunity structure of stream insects: as the crow flies, as the fish swims or as the fox runs?

Olli-Matti Kärnä1, Mira Grönroos2, Harri Antikainen1, Jan Hjort1, Jari Ilmonen3, Lauri Paasivirta4, Jani Heino2.   

Abstract

1. Metacommunity research relies largely on proxies for inferring the effect of dispersal on local community structure. Overland and watercourse distances have been typically used as such proxies. A good proxy for dispersal should, however, take into account more complex landscape features that can affect an organism's movement and dispersal. The cost distance approach does just that, allowing determining the path of least resistance across a landscape. 2. Here, we examined the distance decay of assemblage similarity within a subarctic stream insect metacommunity. We tested whether overland, watercourse and cumulative cost distances performed differently as correlates of dissimilarity in assemblage composition between sites. We also investigated the effect of body size and dispersal mode on metacommunity organization. 3. We found that dissimilarities in assemblage composition correlated more strongly with environmental than physical distances between sites. Overland and watercourse distances showed similar correlations to assemblage dissimilarity between sites, being sometimes significantly correlated with biological variation of entire insect communities. In metacommunities deconstructed by body size or dispersal mode, contrary to our expectation, passive dispersers showed a slightly stronger correlation than active dispersers to environmental differences between sites, although passive dispersers also showed a stronger correlation than active dispersers to physical distances between sites. The strength of correlation between environmental distance and biological dissimilarity also varied slightly among the body size classes. 4. After controlling for environmental differences between sites, cumulative cost distances were slightly better correlates of biological dissimilarities than overland or watercourse distances between sites. However, quantitative differences in correlation coefficients were small between different physical distances. 5. Although environmental differences typically override physical distances as determinants of the composition of stream insect assemblages, correlations between environmental distances and biological dissimilarities are typically rather weak. This undetermined variation may be attributable to dispersal processes, which may be captured using better proxies for the process. We suggest that further modifying the measurement of cost distances may be a fruitful avenue, especially if complemented by more direct natural history information on insect dispersal behaviour and distances travelled by them.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society.

Keywords:  body size; cost distance; dispersal; insects; landscape resistance; overland distance; watercourse distance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25981411     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  9 in total

1.  The challenges that spatial context present for synthesizing community ecology across scales.

Authors:  Christopher J Patrick; Lester L Yuan
Journal:  Oikos       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.903

2.  Signals of Potential Species Associations Offer Clues about Community Organisation of Stream Fish across Seasons.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Yuzhou Zhang; Jorge García-Girón; Kai Tan; Lei Wang; Yihao Ge; Yunzhi Yan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  The role of dispersal mode and habitat specialization for metacommunity structure of shallow beach invertebrates.

Authors:  Iván F Rodil; Paloma Lucena-Moya; Henri Jokinen; Victoria Ollus; Håkan Wennhage; Anna Villnäs; Alf Norkko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental factors and river network position allow prediction of benthic community assemblies: A model of nematode metacommunities.

Authors:  Birgit Gansfort; Walter Traunspurger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Spatial Factors Outperform Local Environmental and Geo-Climatic Variables in Structuring Multiple Facets of Stream Macroinvertebrates' β-Diversity.

Authors:  Naicheng Wu; Guohao Liu; Min Zhang; Yixia Wang; Wenqi Peng; Xiaodong Qu
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Assessment of ecological impairment of Arctic streams: Challenges and future directions.

Authors:  A S Medeiros; A Williams; D Milošević
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Invertebrate Metacommunity Structure and Dynamics in an Andean Glacial Stream Network Facing Climate Change.

Authors:  Sophie Cauvy-Fraunié; Rodrigo Espinosa; Patricio Andino; Dean Jacobsen; Olivier Dangles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Flow directionality, mountain barriers and functional traits determine diatom metacommunity structuring of high mountain streams.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Dong; Bin Li; Fengzhi He; Yuan Gu; Meiqin Sun; Haomiao Zhang; Lu Tan; Wen Xiao; Shuoran Liu; Qinghua Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Correlates of different facets and components of beta diversity in stream organisms.

Authors:  Mariana Perez Rocha; Luis M Bini; Mira Grönroos; Jan Hjort; Marja Lindholm; Satu-Maaria Karjalainen; Katri E Tolonen; Jani Heino
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.