| Literature DB >> 25981190 |
Zuzana Országhová1, Iveta Waczulíková2, Carolina Burki3, Peter Rohdewald4, Zdeňka Ďuračková1.
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to examine the psychological benefits of the treatment with Robuvit® (Horphag Research Ltd.) - polyphenolic extract obtained from the wood of oak Quercus robur - on the healthy elderly individuals using energy subscale scores of the Activation - Deactivation Adjective Check List. Analysis was focused on the comparison of pre-post treatment effect of Robuvit on symptoms of fatigue. In the total group of volunteers, significant increase of average question scores was found in three of four subscales of feelings (energy, tiredness, and tension) after 4 weeks of Robuvit administration. Effects of extract were observed mainly after stratification of total group of volunteers according to the level of feeling at the pre-treatment questionnaire. Our results demonstrate positive effect of Robuvit on mental and energy level in healthy human without any unwanted side effects.Entities:
Keywords: Quercus robur; Robuvit; ellagitannins; fatigue; roburins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25981190 PMCID: PMC4690515 DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phytother Res ISSN: 0951-418X Impact factor: 5.878
The Activation-Deactivation Adjective Check List (AD ACL) (Thayer, 1989)
| Rating scale: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✔✔ | ||||
| ✔ | ||||
| ? | ||||
| no | ||||
| Check list: | ||||
| Active | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Placid | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Sleepy | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Jittery | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Energetic | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Intense | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Calm | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Tired | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Vigorous | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| At-rest | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Drowsy | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Fearful | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Lively | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Still | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Wide-awake | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Clutched-up | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Quiet | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Full-of-pep | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Tense | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
| Wakeful | ✔✔ | ✔ | ? | no |
Instructions to the user: Each of the words describes feelings or mood. Please use the rating scale next to each word to describe your feelings at this moment.
Figure 1Correlation of paired data for Q1 versus Q5, simple linear regression. (a) For total score in Q1 versus Q5 (points in the range of 20–80); r = 0.5704, p = 0.0108. (b) Subscale energy (points in the range of 5–20); r = 0.6829, p = 0.0013. (c) Subscale calmness (points in the range of 5–20); r = 0.5498, p = 0.0147. (d) Subscale tiredness (points in the range of 5–20); r = 0.3703, p = 0.1186. (e) Subscale tension (points in the range of 5–20); r = 0.7555, p = 0.0002. Q1, questionnaire before intervention phase; Q5, questionnaire after intervention phase.
Comparative analysis of average question scores (1–4 points) reached in questionnaires for individual subscales in total sample (all volunteers) (subscales tiredness and tension after reversion)
| Subscale | Mean quest 1 | Mean quest 5 | Change by points | Change by % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 2.400 | 2.611 | 0.211 | 8.8 | 0.0176 |
| Calmness | 2.789 | 2.905 | 0.116 | 4.16 | NS (0.2292) |
| Tiredness | 2.716 | 3.042 | 0.326 | 12 | 0.0070 |
| Tension | 3.663 | 3.821 | 0.158 | 4.31 | 0.0183 |
Figure 2Comparison of total scores reached in the individual questionnaire subscales (5–20 points) reached in subgroup with baseline < 14 points (subscales tiredness and tension after reversion). Q1, questionnaire before intervention phase; Q5, questionnaire after intervention phase.
Comparative analysis of total scores reached in questionnaires using stratification of data in the group with baseline < 14 points (total scores in individual subscales—range 5–20 points) (subscales tiredness and tension after reversion)
| Subscale | Change (points) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | ↑ by 2.18 ( | 0.051 |
| Calmness | ↑ by 2.29 ( | 0.0342 |
| Tiredness | ↑ by 4.0 ( | 0.0679 |
| Tension | − ( | — |