Caroline V M Verhagen1, Rosemarie de Haan2, Floor Hageman1, Tim P D Oostendorp1, Annalisa L E Carli1, Mark J O'Connor3, Jos Jonkers4, Marcel Verheij2, Michiel W van den Brekel5, Conchita Vens6. 1. Division of Biological Stress Response, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 2. Division of Biological Stress Response, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 3. AstraZeneca, DNA Damage Response Strategic Biology Area, Macclesfield, United Kingdom. 4. Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 5. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands. 6. Division of Biological Stress Response, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: c.vens@nki.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The PARP inhibitor olaparib is currently tested in clinical phase 1 trials to define safe dose levels in combination with RT. However, certain clinically relevant insights are still lacking. Here we test, while comparing to single agent activity, the olaparib dose and genetic background dependence of olaparib-mediated radiosensitization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Long-term growth inhibition and clonogenic assays were used to assess radiosensitization in BRCA2-deficient and BRCA2-complemented cells and in a panel of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. RESULTS: The extent of radiosensitization greatly depended on the olaparib dose, the radiation dose and the homologous recombination status of cells. Olaparib concentrations that resulted in radiosensitization prevented PAR induction by irradiation. Seven hours olaparib exposures were sufficient for radiosensitization. Importantly, the radiosensitizing effects can be observed at much lower olaparib doses than the single agent effects. CONCLUSION: Extrapolation of these data to the clinic suggests that low olaparib doses are sufficient to cause radiosensitization, underlining the potential of the treatment. Here we show that drug doses achieving radiosensitization can greatly differ from those achieving single agent activities, an important consideration when developing combined radiotherapy strategies with novel targeted agents.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The PARP inhibitor olaparib is currently tested in clinical phase 1 trials to define safe dose levels in combination with RT. However, certain clinically relevant insights are still lacking. Here we test, while comparing to single agent activity, the olaparib dose and genetic background dependence of olaparib-mediated radiosensitization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Long-term growth inhibition and clonogenic assays were used to assess radiosensitization in BRCA2-deficient and BRCA2-complemented cells and in a panel of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. RESULTS: The extent of radiosensitization greatly depended on the olaparib dose, the radiation dose and the homologous recombination status of cells. Olaparib concentrations that resulted in radiosensitization prevented PAR induction by irradiation. Seven hours olaparib exposures were sufficient for radiosensitization. Importantly, the radiosensitizing effects can be observed at much lower olaparib doses than the single agent effects. CONCLUSION: Extrapolation of these data to the clinic suggests that low olaparib doses are sufficient to cause radiosensitization, underlining the potential of the treatment. Here we show that drug doses achieving radiosensitization can greatly differ from those achieving single agent activities, an important consideration when developing combined radiotherapy strategies with novel targeted agents.
Authors: Ariel L Hernandez; Christian D Young; Li Bian; Kelsey Weigel; Kyle Nolan; Barbara Frederick; Gangwen Han; Guanting He; G Devon Trahan; Michael C Rudolph; Kenneth L Jones; Ayman J Oweida; Sana D Karam; David Raben; Xiao-Jing Wang Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Anne L van de Ven; Shifalika Tangutoori; Paige Baldwin; Ju Qiao; Codi Gharagouzloo; Nina Seitzer; John G Clohessy; G Mike Makrigiorgos; Robert Cormack; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Srinivas Sridhar Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: A Al-Mamgani; M de Ridder; A Navran; W M Klop; J P de Boer; M E Tesselaar Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: John T Poirier; Julie George; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Anton Berns; Elisabeth Brambilla; Lauren A Byers; David Carbone; Huanhuan J Chen; Camilla L Christensen; Caroline Dive; Anna F Farago; Ramaswamy Govindan; Christine Hann; Matthew D Hellmann; Leora Horn; Jane E Johnson; Young S Ju; Sumin Kang; Mark Krasnow; James Lee; Se-Hoon Lee; Jonathan Lehman; Benjamin Lok; Christine Lovly; David MacPherson; David McFadden; John Minna; Matthew Oser; Keunchil Park; Kwon-Sik Park; Yves Pommier; Vito Quaranta; Neal Ready; Julien Sage; Giorgio Scagliotti; Martin L Sos; Kate D Sutherland; William D Travis; Christopher R Vakoc; Sarah J Wait; Ignacio Wistuba; Kwok Kin Wong; Hua Zhang; Jillian Daigneault; Jacinta Wiens; Charles M Rudin; Trudy G Oliver Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Allison N DuRoss; Megan J Neufeld; Shushan Rana; Charles R Thomas; Conroy Sun Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: M de Ridder; Z A R Gouw; J J Sonke; A Navran; B Jasperse; J Heukelom; M E T Tesselaar; W M C Klop; M W M van den Brekel; Abrahim Al-Mamgani Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Sana D Karam; Krishna Reddy; Patrick J Blatchford; Tim Waxweiler; Alicia M DeLouize; Ayman Oweida; Hilary Somerset; Carrie Marshall; Christian Young; Kurtis D Davies; Madeleine Kane; Aik Choo Tan; Xiao Jing Wang; Antonio Jimeno; Dara L Aisner; Daniel W Bowles; David Raben Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 12.531