| Literature DB >> 25981124 |
David Sims, Chris P Ponting, Andreas Heger.
Abstract
How should the next generation of genomics scientists be trained while simultaneously pursuing high quality and diverse research? CGAT, the Computational Genomics Analysis and Training programme, was set up in 2010 by the UK Medical Research Council to complement its investment in next-generation sequencing capacity. CGAT was conceived around the twin goals of training future leaders in genome biology and medicine, and providing much needed capacity to UK science for analysing genome scale data sets. Here we outline the training programme employed by CGAT and describe how it dovetails with collaborative research projects to launch scientists on the road towards independent research careers in genomics.Entities:
Keywords: bioinformatics; genomics; integrative biology; next-generation sequencing; training
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25981124 PMCID: PMC4812590 DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elv021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brief Funct Genomics ISSN: 2041-2649 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1A Gantt chart indicating the structure of a typical CGAT fellowship. Fellows start with up to 6 months of basic training before starting their first project. Fellows work on several overlapping projects during the course of their training and have an opportunity to design and implement their own project (transition project) in the final year of their fellowship. (A colour version of this figure is available online at: http://bfg.oxfordjournals.org)
Figure 2The effect of CGAT training based on self-reporting from CGAT fellows using a 250-point questionnaire. Fellows are asked to indicate their knowledge, experience and confidence in each area on a 5-point scale. Here the scores have been normalized to lie in a range between 0 and 1. (A) Average scores for different training areas for nine CGAT fellows with more than 2 years training. (B) Heatmaps of changes in scores over time (0–36 months) for two individual CGAT fellows who joined with different levels of experience, from self-taught (left) to novice (right) and who selected their own training emphasis over their time in CGAT. Blank squares indicate missing data due to changes in the questionnaire. (A colour version of this figure is available online at: http://bfg.oxfordjournals.org)