Literature DB >> 25980905

Gaze holding deficits discriminate early from late onset cerebellar degeneration.

Alexander A Tarnutzer1, K P Weber, B Schuknecht, D Straumann, S Marti, G Bertolini.   

Abstract

The vestibulo-cerebellum calibrates the output of the inherently leaky brainstem neural velocity-to-position integrator to provide stable gaze holding. In healthy humans small-amplitude centrifugal nystagmus is present at extreme gaze-angles, with a non-linear relationship between eye-drift velocity and eye eccentricity. In cerebellar degeneration this calibration is impaired, resulting in pathological gaze-evoked nystagmus (GEN). For cerebellar dysfunction, increased eye drift may be present at any gaze angle (reflecting pure scaling of eye drift found in controls) or restricted to far-lateral gaze (reflecting changes in shape of the non-linear relationship) and resulting eyed-drift patterns could be related to specific disorders. We recorded horizontal eye positions in 21 patients with cerebellar neurodegeneration (gaze-angle = ±40°) and clinically confirmed GEN. Eye-drift velocity, linearity and symmetry of drift were determined. MR-images were assessed for cerebellar atrophy. In our patients, the relation between eye-drift velocity and gaze eccentricity was non-linear, yielding (compared to controls) significant GEN at gaze-eccentricities ≥20°. Pure scaling was most frequently observed (n = 10/18), followed by pure shape-changing (n = 4/18) and a mixed pattern (n = 4/18). Pure shape-changing patients were significantly (p = 0.001) younger at disease-onset compared to pure scaling patients. Atrophy centered around the superior/dorsal vermis, flocculus/paraflocculus and dentate nucleus and did not correlate with the specific drift behaviors observed. Eye drift in cerebellar degeneration varies in magnitude; however, it retains its non-linear properties. With different drift patterns being linked to age at disease-onset, we propose that the gaze-holding pattern (scaling vs. shape-changing) may discriminate early- from late-onset cerebellar degeneration. Whether this allows a distinction among specific cerebellar disorders remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25980905     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-015-7773-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  23 in total

1.  Proprioceptive neck influences modify the information about tilt direction coded by the cerebellar anterior vermis.

Authors:  D Manzoni; P Andre; O Pompeiano
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  End-point nystagmus and ocular drift: an experimental and theoretical study.

Authors:  M Eizenman; P Cheng; J A Sharpe; R C Frecker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A reexamination of end-point and rebound nystagmus in normals.

Authors:  J Shallo-Hoffmann; H Schwarze; H J Simonsz; H Mühlendyck
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Ocular motor disorders associated with cerebellar lesions: pathophysiology and topical localization.

Authors:  R F Lewis; D S Zee
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Ocular motor dysfunction in total and hemicerebellectomized monkeys.

Authors:  R M Burde; M H Stroud; G Roper-Hall; F P Wirth; J L O'Leary
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Effects of ablation of flocculus and paraflocculus of eye movements in primate.

Authors:  D S Zee; A Yamazaki; P H Butler; G Gücer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Incidence and anatomy of gaze-evoked nystagmus in patients with cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  Bernhard Baier; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Vestibulo-ocular function in patients with cerebellar atrophy.

Authors:  R W Baloh; H R Konrad; V Honrubia
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Gaze failure, drifting eye movements, and centripetal nystagmus in cerebellar disease.

Authors:  J Leech; M Gresty; K Hess; P Rudge
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Gaze holding in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Giovanni Bertolini; Alexander A Tarnutzer; Itsaso Olasagasti; Elham Khojasteh; Konrad P Weber; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Sarah Marti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Distinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Gaze-evoked nystagmus induced by alcohol intoxication.

Authors:  Fausto Romano; Alexander A Tarnutzer; Dominik Straumann; Stefano Ramat; Giovanni Bertolini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Stochastic Physiological Gaze-Evoked Nystagmus With Slow Centripetal Drift During Fixational Eye Movements at Small Gaze Eccentricities.

Authors:  Makoto Ozawa; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Taishin Nomura
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Stroke Prediction Based on the Spontaneous Nystagmus Suppression Test in Dizzy Patients: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Thomas Wyss; Ewa Zamaro; Athanasia Korda; Franca Wagner; Thomas C Sauter; Hassen Kerkeni; Roger Kalla; Miranda Morrison; Marco Domenico Caversaccio
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 11.800

5.  Asymmetry in Gaze-Holding Impairment in Acute Unilateral Ischemic Cerebellar Lesions Critically Depends on the Involvement of the Caudal Vermis and the Dentate Nucleus.

Authors:  F Romano; C J Bockisch; B Schuknecht; G Bertolini; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  A standardized protocol for quantification of saccadic eye movements: DEMoNS.

Authors:  J A Nij Bijvank; A Petzold; L J Balk; H S Tan; B M J Uitdehaag; M Theodorou; L J van Rijn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Physiological Gaze-Evoked and Rebound Nystagmus: Implications for Testing Their Pathological Counterparts.

Authors:  Michelle Sari Ritter; Giovanni Bertolini; Dominik Straumann; Stefan Yu Bögli
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.