Literature DB >> 25980748

Age stratified comparative analysis of perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients after robot assisted radical prostatectomy--A propensity score matched study.

A Kumar1, S Samavedi2, A S Bates2, Camilo A Giedelman Cuevas2, R F Coelho2, B Rocco2, K Palmer2, V R Patel2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to evaluate the perioperative, functional and intermediate term oncological outcomes of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients ≥ 70 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population (N = 3241) consisted of consecutive patients who underwent RARP for localized prostate cancer by a single surgeon (VP) from January 2008 through February 2012. A query of our Institutional Review Board approved registry identified 400 men ≥ 70 years of age, with good functional status (Charlson co-morbidity index < 3). These patients were propensity score matched to younger patients. Perioperative and postoperative functional and oncologic outcomes for the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: Full nerve sparing as well as the ease of nerve sparing were similar in 2 groups. Intra-operative complications were comparable. Postoperative complication occurrence rates were similar. At mean follow up of 34.1 months and 37.2 months respectively in younger and older patients, the continence rate was comparable in 2 groups (91.3% and 87.3%).Average time to continence and potency were similar in 2 groups. A greater proportion of younger patients became potent than elderly (52.3% vs 33.5%,p < 0.001).The biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate was comparable in 2 groups (7.8% vs 8.3%; p = 0.79). The mean time to BCR was also comparable in 2 groups (16 months vs 22.6 months; p = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients (minimal comorbidities with CCI ≤ 2, life expectancy >10 years, localized prostate cancer) RARP is a reasonable option in patients ≥ 7 0 years and provides comparable perioperative, functional and intermediate term oncologic outcomes as compared to younger patients.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age stratified analysis; Oncological outcomes; Potency; Prostatectomy; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25980748     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  8 in total

Review 1.  Long-term cancer control outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Baojun Wang; Qing Ai; Yu Zhang; Xiangjun Lv; Hongzhao Li; Xin Ma; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Fluorescence-guided radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Osamah Hasan; Alexandra Reed; Mohammed Shahait; Raju Chelluri; David I Lee; Ryan W Dobbs
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Advanced age portends poorer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a single center experience.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Alberto Bianchi; Sebastian Gallina; Emanuele Serafin; Giovanni Mazzucato; Stefano Vidiri; Damiano D'Aietti; Riccardo Rizzetto; Alessandro Tafuri; Clara Cerrato; Andrea Panunzio; Rossella Orlando; Davide Brusa; Matteo Brunelli; Salvatore Siracusano; Maria Angela Cerruto; Alessandro Antonelli
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients.

Authors:  Masatomo Nishikawa; Hiromitsu Watanabe; Tomofumi Kurahashi
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2017-01-12

5.  Contemporary trends in radical prostatectomy and predictors of recovery of urinary continence in men aged over 70 years: comparisons between cohorts aged over 70 and less than 70 years.

Authors:  Young Ju Lee; Jin-Woo Jung; Sangchul Lee; Sang Wook Lee; Jeong Hyun Kim; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee; Seong Jin Jeong
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Bladder neck sparing during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Six-year experience.

Authors:  Sercan Yilmaz; Esat Ak; Eymen Gazel; Serdar Yalcin; Kenan Yigit Yildiz; Lutfi Tunc
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-05-24

Review 7.  Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Review.

Authors:  Paolo Capogrosso; Andrea Salonia; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 8.  Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Gideon Blecher; Khaled Almekaty; Odunayo Kalejaiye; Suks Minhas
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-10-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.