Literature DB >> 25980692

A novel 9 × 9 map-based solvent selection strategy for targeted counter-current chromatography isolation of natural products.

Junling Liang1, Jie Meng2, Dingfang Wu3, Mengzhe Guo4, Shihua Wu5.   

Abstract

Counter-current chromatography (CCC) is an efficient liquid-liquid chromatography technique for separation and purification of complex mixtures like natural products extracts and synthetic chemicals. However, CCC is still a challenging process requiring some special technical knowledge especially in the selection of appropriated solvent systems. In this work, we introduced a new 9 × 9 map-based solvent selection strategy for CCC isolation of targets, which permit more than 60 hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (HEMWat) solvent systems as the start candidates for the selection of solvent systems. Among these solvent systems, there are clear linear correlations between partition coefficient (K) and the system numbers. Thus, an appropriate CCC solvent system (i.e., sweet spot for K = 1) may be hit by measurement of k values of the target only in two random solvent systems. Besides this, surprisingly, we found that through two sweet spots, we could get a line ("Sweet line") where there are infinite sweet solvent systems being suitable for CCC separation. In these sweet solvent systems, the target has the same partition coefficient (K) but different solubilities. Thus, the better sweet solvent system with higher sample solubility can be obtained for high capacity CCC preparation. Furthermore, we found that there is a zone ("Sweet zone") where all solvent systems have their own sweet partition coefficients values for the target in range of 0.4 < K< 2.5 or extended range of 0.25 < K < 16. All results were validated by using 14 pure GUESSmix mimic natural products as standards and further confirmed by isolation of several targets including honokiol and magnolol from the extracts of Magnolia officinalis Rehd. Et Wils and tanshinone IIA from Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. In practice, it is much easier to get a suitable solvent system only by making a simple screening two to four HEMWat two-phase solvent systems to obtain the sweet line or sweet zone without special knowledge or comprehensive standards as references. This is an important advancement for solvent system selection and also will be very useful for isolation of current natural products including Traditional Chinese Medicines.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HEMWat 9×9 map; Magnolia officinalis Rehd. Et Wils; Natural products isolation; Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge; Selection of solvent system; Targeted counter-current chromatography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25980692     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.04.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  4 in total

1.  Effects of Oncogenic Gαq and Gα11 Inhibition by FR900359 in Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Dominic Lapadula; Eduardo Farias; Clinita E Randolph; Timothy J Purwin; Dougan McGrath; Thomas H Charpentier; Lihong Zhang; Shihua Wu; Mizue Terai; Takami Sato; Gregory G Tall; Naiming Zhou; Philip B Wedegaertner; Andrew E Aplin; Julio Aguirre-Ghiso; Jeffrey L Benovic
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.852

2.  H2O-Induced Hydrophobic Interactions in MS-Guided Counter-Current Chromatography Separation of Anti-Cancer Mollugin from Rubia cordifolia.

Authors:  Liping Zeng; Tianyi Xu; Jie Meng; Dingfang Wu; Shihua Wu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Bioactivity-guided separation of potential α-glycosidase inhibitor from clerodendranthus spicatus based on HSCCC coupled with molecular docking.

Authors:  Chunsheng Zhu; Hongjuan Niu; Anzheng Nie; Meng Bian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  HSCCC-based strategy for preparative separation of in vivo metabolites after administration of an herbal medicine: Saussurea laniceps, a case study.

Authors:  Tao Yi; Lin Zhu; Guo-Yuan Zhu; Yi-Na Tang; Jun Xu; Jia-Yi Fan; Zhong-Zhen Zhao; Hu-Biao Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.