Literature DB >> 25980641

A practical application of two in silico systems for identification of potentially mutagenic impurities.

Nigel Greene1, Krista L Dobo2, Michelle O Kenyon2, Jennifer Cheung2, Jennifer Munzner2, Zhanna Sobol2, Gregory Sluggett3, Todd Zelesky3, Andreas Sutter4, Joerg Wichard4.   

Abstract

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) M7 guidance for the assessment and control of DNA reactive impurities in pharmaceutical products includes the use of in silico prediction systems as part of the hazard identification and risk assessment strategy. This is the first internationally agreed guidance document to include the use of these types of approaches. The guideline requires the use of two complementary approaches, an expert rule-based method and a statistical algorithm. In addition, the guidance states that the output from these computer-based assessments can be reviewed using expert knowledge to provide additional support or resolve conflicting predictions. This approach is designed to maximize the sensitivity for correctly identifying DNA reactive compounds while providing a framework to reduce the number of compounds that need to be synthesized, purified and subsequently tested in an Ames assay. Using a data set of 801 chemicals and pharmaceutical intermediates, we have examined the relative predictive performances of some popular commercial in silico systems that are in common use across the pharmaceutical industry. The overall accuracy of each of these systems was fairly comparable ranging from 68% to 73%; however, the sensitivity of each system (i.e. how many Ames positive compounds are correctly identified) varied much more dramatically from 48% to 68%. We have explored how these systems can be combined under the ICH M7 guidance to enhance the detection of DNA reactive molecules. Finally, using four smaller sets of molecules, we have explored the value of expert knowledge in the review process, especially in cases where the two systems disagreed on their predictions, and the need for care when evaluating the predictions for large data sets.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational toxicology; Genotoxic impurities; ICH M7; Structure–activity relationships

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25980641     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  6 in total

1.  Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses.

Authors:  Curran Landry; Marlene T Kim; Naomi L Kruhlak; Kevin P Cross; Roustem Saiakhov; Suman Chakravarti; Lidiya Stavitskaya
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  In silico ADME and Toxicity Prediction of Ceftazidime and Its Impurities.

Authors:  Ying Han; Jingpu Zhang; Chang Qin Hu; Xia Zhang; Bufang Ma; Peipei Zhang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  A local QSAR model based on the stability of nitrenium ions to support the ICH M7 expert review on the mutagenicity of primary aromatic amines.

Authors:  Ayaka Furukawa; Satoshi Ono; Katsuya Yamada; Nao Torimoto; Mahoko Asayama; Shigeharu Muto
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2022-03-21

4.  A Rapid Assessment Model for Liver Toxicity of Macrolides and an Integrative Evaluation for Azithromycin Impurities.

Authors:  Miao-Qing Zhang; Jing-Pu Zhang; Chang-Qin Hu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  A rapid and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of four potential mutagenic impurities at trace levels in ripretinib drug substance.

Authors:  Yiwen Huang; Qi Xu; Hui Lu; Zhong Li; Yang Wu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.

Authors:  Masamitsu Honma; Airi Kitazawa; Alex Cayley; Richard V Williams; Chris Barber; Thierry Hanser; Roustem Saiakhov; Suman Chakravarti; Glenn J Myatt; Kevin P Cross; Emilio Benfenati; Giuseppa Raitano; Ovanes Mekenyan; Petko Petkov; Cecilia Bossa; Romualdo Benigni; Chiara Laura Battistelli; Alessandro Giuliani; Olga Tcheremenskaia; Christine DeMeo; Ulf Norinder; Hiromi Koga; Ciloy Jose; Nina Jeliazkova; Nikolay Kochev; Vesselina Paskaleva; Chihae Yang; Pankaj R Daga; Robert D Clark; James Rathman
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.