Literature DB >> 25980558

Challenges in achieving patient participation: A review of how patient participation is addressed in empirical studies.

Sanne Angel1, Kirsten Norup Frederiksen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For decades, it has been an ideal in western countries that individuals should participate in society as self-governing and autonomous subjects; however, this ideal does not always correspond to the actual experiences of individuals in their encounters with health professionals. AIM: This review identifies how empirical studies address challenges in achieving patient participation in clinical nursing.
METHOD: We conducted a literature search for studies of patient participation in PubMed, Cinahl, PsychInfo and Scopus. In a systematic review using Garrard's matrix method, we selected empirical studies that focused on patients' participation in health services. MAIN
FINDINGS: The empirical studies we investigated addressed the relationship between patient and nurse, knowledge, contact time with the patient, severity of illness and the effect of age on the degree of patient involvement. Every study thus investigated assessed patient participation as being achievable. None of the studies questioned the foundation for patient participation, which has been described in theoretical articles. The main explanation for difficulties in achieving patient participation was that expectations concerning the extent and quality of participation could be unrealistic and lead to dissatisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Studies on patient participation identify challenges due to the nature of the relationship between laypersons and professionals, and the embedded difference in situation and knowledge. This difference may be reduced by time and a mutually positive attitude. But participation in its ideal form cannot be achieved because of this fundamental difference. Therefore, the optimal level of patient participation can only be achieved within a framework which provides both patients and health professionals with adequate time to build relationships and shared knowledge.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Matrix method; Nurse–patient relationship; Patient participation; Review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25980558     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  28 in total

1.  Hospitalised patients' experiences during Negative Pressure Wound Therapy due to surgical site infection after vascular and cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Charlotte B Thorup; Mette Hougaard; Pernille F Blindum; Erik E Sørensen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Older people and rural eHealth: perceptions of caring relations and their effects on engagement in digital primary health care.

Authors:  Jens Lindberg; Robert Bhatt; Anton Ferm
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals' views: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Gepke L Veenstra; Kees Ahaus; Gera A Welker; Erik Heineman; Maarten J van der Laan; Friso L H Muntinghe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Jean Spinks; Tracey Bucknall; Georgia Tobiano; Wendy Chaboyer
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Adherence to Report and Patient Perception of an Interactive App for Managing Symptoms During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Descriptive Study of Logged and Interview Data.

Authors:  Ann Langius-Eklöf; Mats Christiansen; Veronica Lindström; Karin Blomberg; Maria Hälleberg Nyman; Yvonne Wengström; Kay Sundberg
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2017-10-31

6.  Patients' Perspective on Participation in Care With or Without the Support of a Smartphone App During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Maria Hälleberg Nyman; Catharina Frank; Ann Langius-Eklöf; Karin Blomberg; Kay Sundberg; Yvonne Wengström
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  The experience of being a participant in one's own care at discharge and at home, following a severe acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ingrid Charlotte Andersen; Thora Grothe Thomsen; Poul Bruun; Uffe Bødtger; Lise Hounsgaard
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2017-12

8.  Fair publication of qualitative research in health systems: a call by health policy and systems researchers.

Authors:  Karen Daniels; Rene Loewenson; Asha George; Natasha Howard; Gergana Koleva; Simon Lewin; Bruno Marchal; Devaki Nambiar; Ligia Paina; Emma Sacks; Kabir Sheikh; Moses Tetui; Sally Theobald; Stephanie M Topp; Anthony B Zwi
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-06-22

9.  The Effects of Intensive Nutrition Education on Late Middle-Aged Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ye Li; Meihong Xu; Rui Fan; Xiaotao Ma; Jiaojiao Gu; Xiaxia Cai; Rui Liu; Qihe Chen; Jinwei Ren; Ruixue Mao; Lei Bao; Zhaofeng Zhang; Junbo Wang; Yong Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Individual user involvement at Healthy Life Centres: a qualitative study exploring the perspective of health professionals.

Authors:  Espen Sagsveen; Marit By Rise; Kjersti Grønning; Ola Bratås
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.