Literature DB >> 25980328

Outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in super-super-obese patients.

J Hunter Mehaffey1, Damien J LaPar2, Florence E Turrentine2, Michael S Miller2, Peter T Hallowell2, Bruce D Schirmer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited outcome data for super-super-obese (SSO) patients, those with Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 60 kg/m(2), who seek surgical treatment with Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB). A large single center LRYGB experience was reviewed to compare the safety and efficacy of LRYGB in SSO patients to the standard obese population undergoing this procedure.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database and an Institutional Review Board approved prospective database was used to identify all patients undergoing LRYGB by multiple surgeons at a single institution between 1/1/1994 and 11/15/2013. Preoperative co-morbidities, postoperative complications, 30-day outcomes, and weight loss at yearly intervals were analyzed to determine difference between SSO patients and NonSSO patients (BMI < 60 kg/m(2)).
RESULTS: Of the 2009 patients undergoing LRYGB over the past 20 years; 328 had BMI ≥ 60 kg/m(2). Preoperative co-morbidities, conversion to open, and length of stay were significantly increased among SSO patients; however there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes or complications. Percent reduction of excess BMI beyond 12 months was significantly improved among NonSSO patients with less than 30% follow-up beyond 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: LRYGB appears well tolerated for super-super-obese patients with BMI ≥ 60 kg/m(2) in experienced centers. These patients still have significant reduction in excess BMI despite being less than NonSSO patients undergoing RYGB. The ACS NSQIP database provides excellent tracking of institutional progress with bariatric surgical outcomes to facilitate the improvement of best practice techniques.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Gastric bypass; Obesity surgery; Super-super-obese

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25980328     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  12 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Balla; Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Balagué; Sonia Fernández-Ananín; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Following Nissen Fundoplication: Higher Risk Same Reward.

Authors:  Michael D Watson; J Hunter Mehaffey; Bruce D Schirmer; Peter T Hallowell
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Chetan Parmar; Mohamed A Abdelhalim; Kamal K Mahawar; Maureen Boyle; William R J Carr; Neil Jennings; Peter K Small
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Nutrient Deficiency 10 Years Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Who's Responsible?

Authors:  J Hunter Mehaffey; Rachel L Mehaffey; Mathew G Mullen; Florence E Turrentine; Steven K Malin; Bruce Schirmer; Andrew M Wolf; Peter T Hallowell
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Loss of Medicaid insurance after successful bariatric surgery: an unintended outcome.

Authors:  J Hunter Mehaffey; Eric J Charles; Irving L Kron; Bruce Schirmer; Peter T Hallowell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Patient travel for bariatric surgery: does distance matter?

Authors:  J Hunter Mehaffey; Alex D Michaels; Mathew G Mullen; Max O Meneveau; John R Pender; Peter T Hallowell
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  Management of Super-super Obese Patients: Comparison Between Mini (One Anastomosis) Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Brijesh Madhok; Kamal K Mahawar; Maureen Boyle; William R J Carr; Neil Jennings; Norbert Schroeder; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Weight loss outcomes and complications from bariatric surgery in the super super obese.

Authors:  Oscar K Serrano; Jonathan E Tannebaum; Lindsay Cumella; Jenny Choi; Pratibha Vemulapalli; W Scott Melvin; Diego R Camacho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for High-Risk Patients, High Body Mass Index (> 50 kg/m2) Patients, and Contraindication to Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Renjie Li; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker; Andreas Adler; Maximilian Specht; Wael Eskander; Mahmoud Ismail; Harun Badakhshi; Manoel Passos Galvao; Ricardo Zorron
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: Patients with Body Mass Index 60 or Greater.

Authors:  Raelina S Howell; Helen H Liu; Harika Boinpally; Meredith Akerman; Elizabeth Carruthers; Barbara M Brathwaite; Patrizio Petrone; Collin E M Brathwaite
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.