| Literature DB >> 25979965 |
Maria M Romeiras1, Filipa Monteiro2, M Cristina Duarte3, Hanno Schaefer4, Mark Carine5.
Abstract
Conservation of plant diversity on islands relies on a good knowledge of the taxonomy, distribution and genetic diversity of species. In recent decades, a combination of morphology- and DNA-based approaches has become the standard for investigating island plant lineages and this has led, in some cases, to the discovery of previously overlooked diversity, including 'cryptic species'. The flora of the Cape Verde archipelago in the North Atlantic is currently thought to comprise ∼740 vascular plant species, 92 of them endemics. Despite the fact that it is considered relatively well known, there has been a 12 % increase in the number of endemics in the last two decades. Relatively few of the Cape Verde plant lineages have been included in genetic studies so far and little is known about the patterns of diversification in the archipelago. Here we present an updated list for the endemic Cape Verde flora and analyse diversity patterns for three endemic plant lineages (Cynanchum, Globularia and Umbilicus) based on one nuclear (ITS) and four plastid DNA regions. In all three lineages, we find genetic variation. In Cynanchum, we find two distinct haplotypes with no clear geographical pattern, possibly reflecting different ploidy levels. In Globularia and Umbilicus, differentiation is evident between populations from northern and southern islands. Isolation and drift resulting from the small and fragmented distributions, coupled with the significant distances separating the northern and southern islands, could explain this pattern. Overall, our study suggests that the diversity in the endemic vascular flora of Cape Verde is higher than previously thought and further work is necessary to characterize the flora. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.Entities:
Keywords: Cynanchum; DNA barcoding; Globularia; Macaronesian Islands; Umbilicus; multi-island endemics (MIEs)
Year: 2015 PMID: 25979965 PMCID: PMC4501515 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Figure 1.Relationship between the vascular endemic species of Cape Verde and their distribution within the five distributional elements: northern (i.e. Santo Antão, São Vicente, Santa Luzia and São Nicolau), southern (i.e. Santiago, Fogo and Brava), western (including species simultaneously present in northern and southern islands), eastern (i.e. Maio, Sal and Boavista) and ubiquitous (including species present in both western and eastern islands). The distribution of multi-island endemics—MIEs (grey) and single-island endemics—SIEs (black) in each island (right); and within the five distributional elements (bar graph in the centre; the number of taxa is placed above each bar).
List of the endemic vascular plants of Cape Verde grouped by distributional elements (sensu Brochmann ). The acronyms for each island are as follows: SA, Santo Antão; SV, São Vicente; SL, Santa Luzia; SN, São Nicolau; B, Boavista; M, Maio; ST, Santiago; F, Fogo and BR, Brava.
| Distributional elements / Taxon | SA | SV | SL | SN | S | B | M | ST | F | Br | Ecological groups |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Xerophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||||
| | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||||
| | X | X | Hygrophytic | ||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||||||
| | X | X | Xerophytic | ||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||
| | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||||||
| | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||||
| | X | Mesophytic | |||||||||
| | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||||
| | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||
| | X | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | ||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||||
| | X | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | ||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||
| | X | X | Hygrophytic | ||||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | |||||||
| | X | X | X | X | Hygrophytic | ||||||
| | X | X | Xerophytic | ||||||||
| | X | X | Xerophytic | ||||||||
| | X | Xerophytic | |||||||||
| | X | X | Xerophytic | ||||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic |
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | |||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |||
| | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | ||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | |||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | |
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | |
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | |
| | X | X | X | Xerophytic | |||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | |||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | ||
| | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | ||||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | |||||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||
| | X | X | X | X | X | X | Mesophytic | ||||
| | X | X | X | X | Xerophytic | ||||||
Figure 2.Distribution elements and haplotype network for three plant lineages produced with TCS 1.21: (A) Globularia amygdalifolia based on ITS; (B) Umbilicus schmidtii based on cpDNA (matK, psbA-trnH and trnL-F); (C) Cynanchum daltonii based on ITS. The size of circles representing each haplotype is proportional to the number of individuals possessing that haplotype. The acronyms for each island are as follows: SA, Santo Antão; SV, São Vicente; Sl, Santa Luzia; SN, São Nicolau; S, Sal; B, Boavista; M, Maio; ST, Santiago; F, Fogo; and BR, Brava. Plant species (flowering) on the right (photos M.R. and M.C.D.).