Kyungmin Kim1, Karen L Fingerman2, Kira S Birditt3, Steven H Zarit4. 1. Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin. kkim@utexas.edu. 2. Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin. 3. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Families differ widely in the support they provide to adult offspring, both with regard to the overall level as well as the extent to which support is evenly distributed across offspring. This study addressed these dynamics by creating family profiles based on the average level and differentiation of support among children. We also examined demographic and psychological factors that predict typology membership. METHOD: We utilized data from 431 middle-aged parents (aged 40-60) with at least two adult children. Parents provided separate ratings of support given to each child. Latent profile analysis was applied to two indicators of within-family support: mean level and differentiation among offspring. RESULTS: Latent profile analysis identified four patterns of parental support: (a) high support-low differentiation (52%), (b) medium support-high differentiation (26%), (c) low support-low differentiation (17%), and (d) low support-very high differentiation (5%). These patterns reflected distinct family characteristics, such as parental resources, parental beliefs (i.e., equal treatment, obligation), and offspring characteristics. DISCUSSION: Our findings emphasize the need to capture dynamics of support exchanges among multiple offspring at the level of family.
OBJECTIVES: Families differ widely in the support they provide to adult offspring, both with regard to the overall level as well as the extent to which support is evenly distributed across offspring. This study addressed these dynamics by creating family profiles based on the average level and differentiation of support among children. We also examined demographic and psychological factors that predict typology membership. METHOD: We utilized data from 431 middle-aged parents (aged 40-60) with at least two adult children. Parents provided separate ratings of support given to each child. Latent profile analysis was applied to two indicators of within-family support: mean level and differentiation among offspring. RESULTS: Latent profile analysis identified four patterns of parental support: (a) high support-low differentiation (52%), (b) medium support-high differentiation (26%), (c) low support-low differentiation (17%), and (d) low support-very high differentiation (5%). These patterns reflected distinct family characteristics, such as parental resources, parental beliefs (i.e., equal treatment, obligation), and offspring characteristics. DISCUSSION: Our findings emphasize the need to capture dynamics of support exchanges among multiple offspring at the level of family.
Authors: Meng Huo; Laura Napolitano; Frank F Furstenberg; Karen L Fingerman Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Eliza Lai-Yi Wong; Jennifer Mengwei Liao; Christopher Etherton-Beer; Loretta Baldassar; Gary Cheung; Claire Margaret Dale; Elisabeth Flo; Bettina Sandgathe Husebø; Roy Lay-Yee; Adele Millard; Kathy Ann Peri; Praveen Thokala; Chek-Hooi Wong; Patsy Yuen-Kwan Chau; Crystal Ying Chan; Roger Yat-Nork Chung; Eng-Kiong Yeoh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 3.390