Literature DB >> 25979815

Endosonography-related mortality and morbidity for pulmonary indications: a nationwide survey in the Netherlands.

Martin B von Bartheld1, Jouke T Annema2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endosonography is being implemented rapidly in pulmonary medicine for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer, the assessment of sarcoidosis, and the assessment of mediastinal lesions. Although serious adverse events (SAEs) have been described, safety data outside cohort studies are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the SAE and mortality rate of EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) and endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for mediastinal and/or hilar analysis.
DESIGN: Nationwide, retrospective survey by using questionnaires.
SETTING: All hospitals in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA for intrathoracic analysis in the period 1999 to 2011.
INTERVENTIONS: EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Occurrence of fatal outcomes and SAEs. Detailed information was obtained for each reported case, and all cases were reviewed independently by 2 investigators, including identification of risk factors.
RESULTS: All 89 hospitals (100%) responded. An estimated 14,075 EUS-FNA and 2675 EBUS procedures were performed. Seven patients died after endosonography (5 EUS-FNA, 2 EBUS [mortality rate 0.04%]). All fatalities occurred in patients of poor performance status (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score of III/IV). Twenty-five SAEs were reported (22 EUS-FNA, 3 EBUS [SAE rate of 0.15%; EUS-FNA 0.16%, EBUS 0.11%]). SAEs were mostly (64%) of infectious origin. No specific risk factors for infectious adverse events could be identified. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study, possible recall bias, overrepresentation of EUS-FNA cases.
CONCLUSION: Endosonography appears to be a safe technique for the analysis of mediastinal and/or hilar lesions. Poor performance status is a risk factor for fatal outcomes. Mediastinitis and/or mediastinal abscess formation is rare but is a potential and dangerous adverse event of endosonography.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979815     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Christoph Frank Dietrich; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  The role of endobronchial ultrasound versus mediastinoscopy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Czarnecka-Kujawa; Kazuhiro Yasufuku
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  [Sarcoidosis].

Authors:  B C Frye; J C Schupp; T C Köhler; R E Voll; J Müller-Quernheim
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 4.  The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Interventional Management of Mediastinal Collections: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Julio G Velasquez-Rodriguez; Sandra Maisterra; Ricard Ramos; Ignacio Escobar; Joan B Gornals
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-09

Review 5.  Role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in staging of lung cancer: a thoracic surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Giulio Melloni; Federico Mazza; Massimiliano Venturino; Davide Turello
Journal:  Mediastinum       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic mediastinal staging.

Authors:  Angelo Carretta
Journal:  Mediastinum       Date:  2020-09-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.