Literature DB >> 25979728

Open aortic arch replacement in high-risk patients: the gold standard.

Mauro Iafrancesco1, Aaron M Ranasinghe2, Vamsidhar Dronavalli2, Donald J Adam1, Martin W Claridge1, Peter Riley3, Ian McCafferty3, Jorge G Mascaro4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Open total aortic arch replacement (TAR) in high-risk patients is considered by some to be associated with a prohibitively perioperative risk. Recent reports describe hybrid techniques to treat this group. We reviewed our outcomes of open surgery in a 'high-risk' group of patients.
METHODS: All patients who underwent open TAR between 2000 and 2013 were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Patients comparable with the ones who underwent hybrid repair in previous studies (logistic EuroSCORE between 20 and 60 without intervention on the aortic root or on the mitral/tricuspid valve) were selected for analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were identified. Median logistic EuroSCORE was 27.4 (range 20-57) and median age was 76 years (34.5% male). There were 11 resternotomies (18.9%) and 20 procedures were urgent/emergency (34.5%). Preoperative comorbidities included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (31%), coronary artery disease (22.4%), peripheral vascular disease (48.3%), previous stroke (5.2%), previous myocardial infarction (3.4%) and left ventricular dysfunction (12%). Concomitant procedures included aortic valve replacement/resuspension (58.7%), coronary artery bypass grafting (22.4%), open descending aorta replacement (10.3%) and frozen elephant trunk (19%). Overall in-hospital mortality, permanent stroke and spinal cord injury rate were 6.9, 1.7 and 0%, respectively. There were no deaths or stroke in the elective group. One-year, 5-year and 10-year estimates of survival were 82.7, 70.0 and 37.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Open TAR can be performed with low mortality and morbidity and excellent long-term results even in high-risk patients. Total endovascular repair may represent an option for patients not suitable for open surgery.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic arch; Hybrid repair; Total arch replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979728     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  3 in total

1.  Long-term survival and related outcomes for hybrid versus traditional arch repair-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adam Chakos; Dean Jbara; Tristan D Yan; David H Tian
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05

2.  Outcomes of different aortic arch replacement techniques.

Authors:  Djamila Abjigitova; Mostafa M Mokhles; Grigorios Papageorgiou; Jos A Bekkers; Ad J J C Bogers
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.620

3.  Early Outcomes of Three Total Arch Replacement Strategies for DeBakey Type I Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Enzehua Xie; Jinlin Wu; Juntao Qiu; Lu Dai; Jiawei Qiu; Qipeng Luo; Wenxiang Jiang; Fangfang Cao; Rui Zhao; Shuya Fan; Wei Gao; Hongwei Guo; Xiaogang Sun; Cuntao Yu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-04-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.