Literature DB >> 25979719

Optimal Strategies for Reporting Pain in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: Recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop.

Jason W Busse1,2, Susan J Bartlett3,4, Maxime Dougados3,4, Bradley C Johnston3,4, Gordon H Guyatt3,4, John R Kirwan3,4, Kent Kwoh3,4, Lara J Maxwell3,4, Andrew Moore3,4, Jasvinder A Singh3,4, Randall Stevens3,4, Vibeke Strand3,4, Maria E Suarez-Almazor3,4, Peter Tugwell3,4, George A Wells3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pain is a patient-important outcome, but current reporting in randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews is often suboptimal, impeding clinical interpretation and decision making.
METHODS: A working group at the 2014 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT 12) was convened to provide guidance for reporting treatment effects regarding pain for individual studies and systematic reviews.
RESULTS: For individual trials, authors should report, in addition to mean change, the proportion of patients achieving 1 or more thresholds of improvement from baseline pain (e.g., ≥ 20%, ≥ 30%, ≥ 50%), achievement of a desirable pain state (e.g., no worse than mild pain), and/or a combination of change and state. Effects on pain should be accompanied by other patient-important outcomes to facilitate interpretation. When pooling data for metaanalysis, authors should consider converting all continuous measures for pain to a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and use the established, minimally important difference (MID) of 10 mm, and the conventionally used, appreciably important differences of 20 mm, 30 mm, and 50 mm, to facilitate interpretation. Effects ≤ 0.5 units suggest a small or very small effect. To further increase interpretability, the pooled estimate on the VAS should also be transformed to a binary outcome and expressed as a relative risk and risk difference. This transformation can be achieved by calculating the probability of experiencing a treatment effect greater than the MID and the thresholds for appreciably important differences in pain reduction in the control and intervention groups.
CONCLUSION: Presentation of relative effects regarding pain will facilitate interpretation of treatment effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLINICAL TRIALS; OMERACT; OUTCOMES; PAIN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979719     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  44 in total

1.  Addressing the limitations of the CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic noncancer pain.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; David Juurlink; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Effect of Graded Sensorimotor Retraining on Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matthew K Bagg; Benedict M Wand; Aidan G Cashin; Hopin Lee; Markus Hübscher; Tasha R Stanton; Neil E O'Connell; Edel T O'Hagan; Rodrigo R N Rizzo; Michael A Wewege; Martin Rabey; Stephen Goodall; Sopany Saing; Serigne N Lo; Hannu Luomajoki; Robert D Herbert; Chris G Maher; G Lorimer Moseley; James H McAuley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 157.335

3.  Sublingual sufentanil tablet system Zalviso® for postoperative analgesia after knee replacement in fast track surgery: a pilot observational study.

Authors:  Marco Scardino; Tiziana D'Amato; Federica Martorelli; Giorgia Fenocchio; Vincenzo Simili; Berardo Di Matteo; Dario Bugada; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 4.  Local anaesthetic sympathetic blockade for complex regional pain syndrome.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; Benedict M Wand; William Gibson; Daniel B Carr; Frank Birklein; Tasha R Stanton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-28

Review 5.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Leica S Claydon; G Peter Herbison; Gareth Jones; Carole A Paley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-09

6.  The RESOLVE Trial for people with chronic low back pain: statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Matthew K Bagg; Serigne Lo; Aidan G Cashin; Rob D Herbert; Neil E O'Connell; Hopin Lee; Markus Hübscher; Benedict M Wand; Edel O'Hagan; Rodrigo R N Rizzo; G Lorimer Moseley; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher G Maher; Stephen Goodall; Sopany Saing; James H McAuley
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Celecoxib for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Livia Puljak; Ana Marin; Davorka Vrdoljak; Filipa Markotic; Ana Utrobicic; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 8.  Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II.

Authors:  Keith M Smart; Benedict M Wand; Neil E O'Connell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-24

9.  Investigating the Mechanisms of Graded Sensorimotor Precision Training in Adults With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Causal Mediation Analysis of the RESOLVE Trial.

Authors:  Aidan G Cashin; Hopin Lee; Matthew K Bagg; Benedict M Wand; Edel O'Hagan; Rodrigo R N Rizzo; Tasha R Stanton; G Lorimer Moseley; James H McAuley
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-07-02

10.  Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of muscle relaxants for adults with non-specific low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aidan G Cashin; Thiago Folly; Matthew K Bagg; Michael A Wewege; Matthew D Jones; Michael C Ferraro; Hayley B Leake; Rodrigo R N Rizzo; Siobhan M Schabrun; Sylvia M Gustin; Richard Day; Christopher M Williams; James H McAuley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.