Literature DB >> 25979562

Protocol for suspected pediatric appendicitis limits computed tomography utilization.

Amy E Wagenaar1, Jun Tashiro1, Bo Wang1, Miosotys Curbelo2, Kenneth L Mendelson2, Eduardo A Perez3, Anthony R Hogan3, Holly L Neville3, Juan E Sola4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite radiation concerns, computed tomography (CT) remains the favored imaging modality at many children's hospitals for appendicitis. We sought to reduce CT utilization for appendicitis in a children's hospital with an algorithm relying on 24-h ultrasound (US) as the primary imaging study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An US-based protocol for suspected appendicitis was adopted at the end of the fiscal year (FY) 2011. Data were collected for 12 mo before and 24 mo after implementation. Imaging test usage and charges were adjusted per annual number of appendectomies. Training of emergency department staff continued over 1 y after protocol implementation.
RESULTS: For FY 2011, 644 abdominal CT and 1088 appendix US were ordered, and 249 laparoscopic appendectomies (LAs) were performed. After protocol implementation, FY 2012: 535 CT, 1285 US, and 265 LA were performed; and FY 2013: 330 CT, 1235 US, and 236 LA were performed. Length of stay decreased from before to after protocol (2.57 ± 0.29 versus 2.15 ± 0.11 d), P < 0.001. CTs per appendectomy decreased 42% from FY 2011 to FY 2013 (2.43 versus 1.40, P < 0.001) and 30% from before to after protocol (2.43 versus 1.70, P < 0.001). A corresponding 27% increase in number of US before to after protocol (4.11 versus 5.20 US/appendectomy, P = 0.004) occurred. CT and US charges decreased $2253 and $6633 per appendectomy for FY 2012 and 2013, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-driven workup with US significantly reduced CT utilization, radiation exposure, and imaging-related charges in children with suspected appendicitis. Ongoing training of emergency department staff is required to ensure protocol compliance.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicitis; Computed tomography; Pediatrics; Protocol; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979562     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rentea; Shawn D St Peter; Charles L Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Utilization of computed tomography imaging in the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Daniel Jack Frush; Clayton W Commander; Terry Scott Hartman; Aaron Kyle Cecil; Brian Douglas Handly; Daniel B Park; Lynn Ansley Fordham
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-12-05

3.  Combining Ultrasound with a Pediatric Appendicitis Score to Distinguish Complicated from Uncomplicated Appendicitis in a Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Tran Kiem Hao; Nguyen Tien Chung; Huynh Quang Huy; Nguyen Thi My Linh; Nguyen Thanh Xuan
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2020-06

4.  Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Diagnostic Imaging for Pediatric Appendicitis: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Dustin W Ballard; David R Vinson; Uli K Chettipally; Steven P Dehmer; Heidi Ekstrom; Adina S Rauchwerger; Brianna McMichael; Dale M Cotton; Mamata V Kene; Laura E Simon; Jingyi Zhu; E Margaret Warton; Patrick J O'Connor; Elyse O Kharbanda
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 5.  A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings.

Authors:  Brian Lentz; Tiffany Fong; Randall Rhyne; Nicholas Risko
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2021-03-09

6.  How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first.

Authors:  Gerhard Mostbeck; E Jane Adam; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Michel Claudon; Dirk Clevert; Carlos Nicolau; Christiane Nyhsen; Catherine M Owens
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-02-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.