Literature DB >> 2597951

Declining indications for abdominoperineal resection.

W O Kirwan1, M G O'Riordain, R Waldron.   

Abstract

In 126 consecutive patients operated on for carcinoma of the lower two-thirds of the rectum, a consistent policy of sphincter preservation resulted in 100 (79 per cent) having anterior resection and 22 (17 per cent) abdominoperineal resection. Perioperative complications in the anterior resection group were: death (two patients), clinical leakage (three patients), pulmonary embolism (five patients), pelvic haematoma (one patient), small bowel obstruction (one patient) and wound sepsis (six patients). Of 55 patients who had a potentially curative anterior resection with follow-up of at least 2 years, one developed local recurrence. Five per cent of patients had significant continence problems. Low anterior resection for carcinoma is associated with low perioperative morbidity, satisfactory functional results and acceptable local recurrence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2597951     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800761025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  9 in total

1.  Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the truth lies underneath.

Authors:  Jesús A Fernández-Represa; Julio M Mayol; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Retrocolic pelvic omentoplasty in abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.

Authors:  G J Poston; S R Smith; W N Baker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Towards earlier detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M G O'Riordain; T F Gorey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  Y Ziv; A Zbar; Y Bar-Shavit; I Igov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; M R Cox; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Changes in outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: one surgeon's experience.

Authors:  J M Kiely; E G Kavanagh; A M Guiney; C Fiuza-Castineira; P V Delaney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Role of intraoperative frozen section for assessing distal resection margin after anterior resection.

Authors:  Rachel M Gomes; Manish Bhandare; Ashwin Desouza; Munita Bal; Avanish P Saklani
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Evidence of improving survival of patients with rectal cancer in france: a population based study.

Authors:  C Finn-Faivre; J Maurel; A M Benhamiche; C Herbert; E Mitry; G Launoy; J Faivre
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Late outcomes of colorectal cancer treatment: a FECS-EUROCARE study.

Authors:  Gemma Gatta; Laura Ciccolallo; Jean Faivre; Anne-Marie Bouvier; Franco Berrino; Jean Pierre Gerard
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.442

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.