Literature DB >> 25979446

Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface.

Pietro Venezia1, Ferruccio Torsello2, Raffaele Cavalcanti3, Salvatore D'Amato4.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Monolithic zirconia prostheses on teeth or implants have been proposed in recent years as a potential treatment. To date, limited data regarding the outcomes of these prostheses have been presented and are mainly based on limited sample size and short-term follow-up. Data on complete-arch monolithic zirconia prostheses are relatively scarce.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical performances of 26 implant-supported, complete-arch, monolithic zirconia restorations with facial feldspathic porcelain veneers for the rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients' charts from 2 private practices from 2010 to 2013 were reviewed. Patients rehabilitated with a complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses were included in the study. Several parameters were recorded so as to evaluate the outcome of these rehabilitations: implant survival and success rates, prosthesis survival rate, interproximal bone loss, periimplant probing depth, and bleeding on probing. The number and type of prosthetic complications were also recorded. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients were treated with a total of 26 complete-arch fixed prostheses. The mean follow-up time was 20.9 months (SD 13.6; range, 10 to 36 months). In total, 154 implants were placed supporting 309 retainers and pontics. The implant survival rate was 100% and the success rate was 94.8%. Mean bone loss was 0.66 mm (SD 0.59 mm). Mean probing depth was 3.4 mm (SD 0.92 mm). Bleeding on probing was positive in 19% of probing sites. The prosthesis survival rate was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective evaluation showed that monolithic zirconia restorations with facial porcelain veneer provided satisfactory clinical performance and suggest that these rehabilitations are a viable treatment option for completely edentulous patients.
Copyright © 2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979446     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Fatih Sari; Asli Secilmis; Irfan Simsek; Semih Ozsevik
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Effect of different semimonolithic designs on fracture resistance and fracture mode of translucent and high-translucent zirconia crowns.

Authors:  Fahad Bakitian; Przemek Seweryniak; Evaggelia Papia; Christel Larsson; Per Vult von Steyern
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-03-28

3.  Aging of monolithic zirconia dental prostheses: Protocol for a 5-year prospective clinical study using ex vivo analyses.

Authors:  Vinciane Koenig; Claudine P Wulfman; Mathieu A Derbanne; Nathalie M Dupont; Stéphane O Le Goff; Mie-Leng Tang; Laurence Seidel; Thibaut Y Dewael; Alain J Vanheusden; Amélie K Mainjot
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-06-17

Review 4.  Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Fernando Zarone; Maria Irene Di Mauro; Pietro Ausiello; Gennaro Ruggiero; Roberto Sorrentino
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Technical and Biological Complications of Screw-Retained (CAD/CAM) Monolithic and Partial Veneer Zirconia for Fixed Dental Prostheses on Posterior Implants Using a Digital Workflow: A 3-Year Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Paolo De Angelis; Giulio Gasparini; Francesca Camodeca; Silvio De Angelis; Margherita Giorgia Liguori; Edoardo Rella; Francesca Cannata; Antonio D'Addona; Paolo Francesco Manicone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of indirect resin composite to resin matrix ceramics.

Authors:  Ersan Çelik; Sezgi Cinel Şahin; Doğu Ömür Dede
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 1.904

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.