Literature DB >> 25979248

Is the anesthesiologist necessary in the endoscopy suite? A review of patients, payers and safety.

John Birk1, Roopjeet Kaur Bath.   

Abstract

The use of propofol for sedation during endoscopy has been increasing, particularly given its association with superior patient satisfaction. Propofol sedation may also allow for higher quality endoscopy exams, increased efficiency of endoscopy suites and most particularly, permit better patient compliance with colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. However, propofol is typically provided by anesthesia specialists via monitored anesthesia care, and is associated with significant economic burden. Given the increasing use of monitored anesthesia care, which adds significant costs to endoscopy, payers are likely to react with changes in payer policies. One alternative to monitored anesthesia care is non-anesthesiologist administered propofol, which due to safety concerns and a lack of reimbursement has not been widely adopted in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; monitored anesthesia care; patient satisfaction; propofol; sedation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979248     DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1041508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1747-4124            Impact factor:   3.869


  6 in total

1.  Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Daza; Carolyn M Tan; Ryan J Fielding; Allison Brown; Forough Farrokhyar; Ilun Yang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  No increased risk of perforation during colonoscopy in patients undergoing propofol versus traditional sedation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minmin Xue; Jian Tian; Jing Zhang; Hongbin Zhu; Jun Bai; Sujuan Zhang; Qili Wang; Shuge Wang; Xuzheng Song; Donghong Ma; Jia Li; Yongmin Zhang; Wei Li; Dongxu Wang
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-09

3.  Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Daza; Carolyn M Tan; Ryan J Fielding; Allison Brown; Forough Farrokhyar; Ilun Yang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol in Training Anesthesiology Residents in Colonoscopy Sedation: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Jia-feng Wang; Bo Li; Yu-guang Yang; Xiao-hua Fan; Jin-bao Li; Xiao-ming Deng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-01-20

5.  Delayed endoscopic removal of sharp foreign body in the esophagus increased clinical complications: An experience from multiple centers in China.

Authors:  Jingjing Yuan; Mengjie Ma; Yang Guo; Bili He; Zhenzhai Cai; Bin Ye; Lei Xu; Jiang Liu; Jin Ding; Zhongfa Zheng; Jianhua Duan; Liangjing Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  A combination of fecal calprotectin and human beta-defensin 2 facilitates diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  R Gacesa; A Vich Vila; V Collij; Z Mujagic; A Kurilshikov; M D Voskuil; E A M Festen; C Wijmenga; D M A E Jonkers; G Dijkstra; J Fu; A Zhernakova; F Imhann; R K Weersma
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.