C P Bourdeaux1, K Birnie2, A Trickey2, M J C Thomas3, J Sterne2, J L Donovan2, J Benger4, J Brandling5, T H Gould3. 1. Intensive Care Unit, Queens Building, University Hospitals Bristol, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK chrisbourdeaux@gmail.com christopher.bourdeaux@uhbristol.nhs.uk. 2. School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Clifton, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK. 3. Intensive Care Unit, Queens Building, University Hospitals Bristol, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK. 4. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK. 5. Independent Researcher, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that the use of tidal volumes <6 ml kg(-1) predicted body weight (PBW) reduces mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. We evaluated the effectiveness of using a large screen displaying delivered tidal volume in ml kg(-1) (PBW) for reducing tidal volumes. METHODS: We assessed the intervention in two 6-month periods. A qualitative study was undertaken after the intervention period to examine staff interaction with the intervention. The study was conducted in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit at University Hospitals Bristol, UK. Consecutive patients requiring controlled mechanical ventilation for more than 1 h were included. Alerts were triggered when tidal volume breached predetermined targets and these alerts were visible to ICU clinicians in real time. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients with 7640 h of data were observed during the control time period and 249 patients with 10 656 h of data were observed in the intervention period. Time spent with tidal volumes <6 ml kg(-1) PBW increased from 17.5 to 28.6% of the period of controlled mechanical ventilation. Time spent with a tidal volume <8 ml kg(-1) PBW increased from 60.6 to 73.9%. The screens were acceptable to staff and stimulated an increase in attendance of clinicians at the bedside to adjust ventilators. CONCLUSIONS: Changing the format of data and displaying it with real-time alerts reduced delivered tidal volumes. Configuring information in a format more likely to result in desired outcomes has the potential to improve the translation of evidence into practice.
BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that the use of tidal volumes <6 ml kg(-1) predicted body weight (PBW) reduces mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. We evaluated the effectiveness of using a large screen displaying delivered tidal volume in ml kg(-1) (PBW) for reducing tidal volumes. METHODS: We assessed the intervention in two 6-month periods. A qualitative study was undertaken after the intervention period to examine staff interaction with the intervention. The study was conducted in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit at University Hospitals Bristol, UK. Consecutive patients requiring controlled mechanical ventilation for more than 1 h were included. Alerts were triggered when tidal volume breached predetermined targets and these alerts were visible to ICU clinicians in real time. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients with 7640 h of data were observed during the control time period and 249 patients with 10 656 h of data were observed in the intervention period. Time spent with tidal volumes <6 ml kg(-1) PBW increased from 17.5 to 28.6% of the period of controlled mechanical ventilation. Time spent with a tidal volume <8 ml kg(-1) PBW increased from 60.6 to 73.9%. The screens were acceptable to staff and stimulated an increase in attendance of clinicians at the bedside to adjust ventilators. CONCLUSIONS: Changing the format of data and displaying it with real-time alerts reduced delivered tidal volumes. Configuring information in a format more likely to result in desired outcomes has the potential to improve the translation of evidence into practice.
Authors: Christopher P Bourdeaux; Matthew Jc Thomas; Timothy H Gould; Gaurav Malhotra; Andreas Jarvstad; Timothy Jones; Iain D Gilchrist Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Christopher J McWilliams; Daniel J Lawson; Raul Santos-Rodriguez; Iain D Gilchrist; Alan Champneys; Timothy H Gould; Mathew Jc Thomas; Christopher P Bourdeaux Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 2.692