Literature DB >> 25979146

Comparison of Blood Flow in Branched and Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Harkamaljot Kandail1, Mohamad Hamady2, Xiao Yun Xu3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a computational study assessing the hemodynamic outcomes of branched stent-grafts (BSGs) for different anatomic variations.
METHODS: Idealized models of BSGs and fenestrated stent-grafts (FSGs) were constructed with different visceral takeoff angles (ToA) and lateral aortic neck angles. ToA was defined as the angle between the centerlines of the main stent-graft and side branch, with 90° representing normal alignment, and 30° and 120° representing angulated side branches. Computational simulations were performed by solving the conservation equations governing the blood flow under physiologically realistic conditions.
RESULTS: The largest renal flow recirculation zones (FRZs) were observed in FSGs at a ToA of 30°, and the smallest FRZ was also found in FSGs (at a ToA of 120°). For straight-neck stent-grafts with a ToA of 90°, mean flow in each renal artery was 0.54, 0.46, and 0.62 L/min in antegrade BSGs, retrograde BSGs, and FSGs, respectively. For angulated stent-grafts, the corresponding values were 0.53, 0.48, and 0.63 L/min. All straight-neck stent-grafts experienced equal cycle-averaged displacement forces of 1.25, 1.69, and 1.95 N at ToAs of 30°, 90°, and 120°, respectively. Angulated main stent-grafts experienced an equal cycle-averaged displacement force of 3.6 N.
CONCLUSION: The blood flow rate in renal arteries depends on the configuration of the stent-graft, with an FSG giving maximum renal flow and a retrograde BSG resulting in minimum renal flow. Nevertheless, the difference was small, up to 0.09 L/min. Displacement forces exerted on stent-grafts are very sensitive to lateral neck angle but not on the configuration of the stent-graft.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal aortic aneurysm; antegrade stent-grafts; computational fluid dynamics; displacement force; endovascular aneurysm repair; fenestrated stent-grafts; hemodynamics; renal artery blood flow; retrograde stent-grafts

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979146     DOI: 10.1177/1526602815587261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  6 in total

1.  Patient-specific changes in aortic hemodynamics is associated with thrombotic risk after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair with large diameter endografts.

Authors:  Kenneth Tran; K Brennan Feliciano; Weiguang Yang; Erica L Schwarz; Alison L Marsden; Ronald L Dalman; Jason T Lee
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2022-04-21

2.  Haemodynamic Analysis of Branched Endografts for Complex Aortic Arch Repair.

Authors:  Sampad Sengupta; Mohamad Hamady; Xiao-Yun Xu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

3.  Clinical Validation of the Impact of Branch Stent Extension on Hemodynamics in ISF-TEVAR Involving LSA Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiateng Hu; Fengshi Li; Peng Qiu; Xiaoyu Wu; Hongji Pu; Zhen Zhao; Jinbao Qin; Guang Liu; Shanliang Jin; Xinwu Lu; Xiaobing Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Hemodynamic Functions of Fenestrated Stent Graft under Resting, Hypertension, and Exercise Conditions.

Authors:  Harkamaljot Singh Kandail; Mohamad Hamady; Xiao Yun Xu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-06-14

5.  Effect of a Flared Renal Stent on the Performance of Fenestrated Stent-Grafts at Rest and Exercise Conditions.

Authors:  Harkamaljot Kandail; Mohamad Hamady; Xiao Yun Xu
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Patient-specific computational flow modelling for assessing hemodynamic changes following fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Kenneth Tran; Weiguang Yang; Alison Marsden; Jason T Lee
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2021-03-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.