Literature DB >> 25979000

Improving the care of patients with a hip fracture: a quality improvement report.

David Hawkes1, Jonathan Baxter1, Claire Bailey1, Gemma Holland1, Jennifer Ruddlesdin1, Alun Wall1, Philip Wykes1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality and their incidence is set to increase. The National Hip Fracture Database and the Best Practice Tariff were introduced with the aim of improving patient care. This complete audit cycle charts the substantial clinical improvements that were achieved in a busy district general hospital.
METHODS: The first audit cycle comprised 379 patients who were admitted between May 2012 and April 2013. The primary audit criterion was operative intervention within 36 h of admission. Variation according to the day of the week of admission was assessed to evaluate specific deficiencies in local service provision. The principle audit intervention was the introduction of two additional morning trauma lists. A re-audit of 162 patients was conducted prospectively between January 2014 and June 2014.
RESULTS: Mean time to theatre was 49±39 h during the first audit cycle compared with 27±19 h (p<0.0001) during the second. Consequently, the proportion of patients undergoing operative intervention within 36 h of admission improved from 41% to 78% (p<0.0001). Overall achievement of Best Practice Tariff was significantly higher during the second cycle: 28% vs 73% (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in the quality of hip fracture care were achieved following this audit. These were accomplished by rigorously analysing the variation in Best Practice Tariff achievement according to the day of the week on which patients were admitted. Targeted interventions could therefore be introduced that addressed specific problems in local service provision. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare quality improvement; Quality improvement; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979000     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  9 in total

Review 1.  Hip fracture registries: utility, description, and comparison.

Authors:  P Sáez-López; F Brañas; N Sánchez-Hernández; N Alonso-García; J I González-Montalvo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A comparison of methods for health policy evaluation with controlled pre-post designs.

Authors:  Stephen O'Neill; Noemi Kreif; Matt Sutton; Richard Grieve
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Early surgery increases mitochondrial DNA release and lung injury in a model of elderly hip fracture and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Jianzheng Zhang; Juan Wang; Xiaowei Wang; Zhi Liu; Jixin Ren; Tiansheng Sun
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures.

Authors:  N C W Harvey; E V McCloskey; P J Mitchell; B Dawson-Hughes; D D Pierroz; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; C Cooper; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Does achieving the best practice tariff improve outcomes in hip fracture patients? An observational cohort study.

Authors:  B Oakley; J Nightingale; C G Moran; I K Moppett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The Dutch Hip Fracture Audit: evaluation of the quality of multidisciplinary hip fracture care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Stijn C Voeten; Arend J Arends; Michel W J M Wouters; Bastiaan J Blom; Martin J Heetveld; Monique S Slee-Valentijn; Pieta Krijnen; Inger B Schipper; J H Han Hegeman
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Hospital differences in mortality rates after hip fracture surgery in Denmark.

Authors:  Pia Kjær Kristensen; Juan Merlo; Nermin Ghith; George Leckie; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  The Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry 13-Year Results from a Population-Based Cohort of Hip Fracture Patients.

Authors:  Pia Kjær Kristensen; Niels Dieter Röck; Helle Collatz Christensen; Alma Becic Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Patient-related healthcare disparities in the quality of acute hip fracture care: a 10-year nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Pia Kjær Kristensen; Anne Mette Falstie-Jensen; Morten Madsen; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.