| Literature DB >> 25978761 |
Yun Xiang1, Yi-Ping Tang1, Bao-Qing Ma1, Hang-Chen Yan1, Jun Jiang2, Xu-Yuan Tian2.
Abstract
Remote monitoring service for elderly persons is important as the aged populations in most developed countries continue growing. To monitor the safety and health of the elderly population, we propose a novel omni-directional vision sensor based system, which can detect and track object motion, recognize human posture, and analyze human behavior automatically. In this work, we have made the following contributions: (1) we develop a remote safety monitoring system which can provide real-time and automatic health care for the elderly persons and (2) we design a novel motion history or energy images based algorithm for motion object tracking. Our system can accurately and efficiently collect, analyze, and transfer elderly activity information and provide health care in real-time. Experimental results show that our technique can improve the data analysis efficiency by 58.5% for object tracking. Moreover, for the human posture recognition application, the success rate can reach 98.6% on average.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25978761 PMCID: PMC4433324 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1System overview.
Fig 2The ODVS device and its structure.
Fig 3Single view point ODVS model and theory.
ODVS Camera Calibration Results.
| Calibration parameters | a0 | a2 | a4 | A | T point | Central accuracy | Calibration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODVS | -90.37 | 0.0034 | 0 | -5.22E-05 | 2.7504 | 322.75 | 0.63 |
Fig 4Bird-view transformation of a panoramic image.
Fig 5An example of the one-to-one calibration.
Fig 6Flow of 380° unwrapping and background updating.
Fig 7Human object tracking example with 380° unwrapped image.
Fig 8Example of the three human postures.
Thresholds of Human Posture Detection.
| Posture | Standing | Sitting | Lying |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold |
| 1.8 > |
|
Fig 9Human posture recognition examples.
Fig 10Comparison example of the human tracking algorithms.
Human Object Extraction Algorithm Efficiency Comparison.
| Algorithms | Time (s) | Frame | Frame size (dpi) | Process time (per frame) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our algorithm | 2.65 | 123 | 740×180 | 0.0216 |
| Camshift | 3.43 | 100 | 740×180 | 0.0343 |
Human Object Tracking Algorithm Efficiency Comparison.
| Algorithms | Time (s) | Frame | Frame size (dpi) | Process time (per frame) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our algorithm | 3.74 | 111 | 740×180 | 0.034 |
| Camshift | 9.22 | 190 | 740×180 | 0.049 |
Fig 11Experiment results of our posture recognition technique.
Posture Recognition Experiment Results.
| Postures | Environment | Total | True | False | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standing | Indoor | 1450 | 1450 | 0 | 100% |
| Standing | Indoor | 1320 | 1320 | 0 | 100% |
| Standing | Indoor | 1230 | 1175 | 55 | 95.52% |