Literature DB >> 25978559

Robotic-Assisted Ureteral Re-implantation: A Case Series.

Shaun E L Wason1, Raymond S Lance1, Robert W Given1, John B Malcolm1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgical techniques are currently used for numerous urologic disorders and generally offer decreased morbidity and equivalent outcomes compared with open surgery. There is a relative paucity of data on robot-assisted ureteral re-implantation (RAUR) in adult patients for benign stricture disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our recent experience with mid-/distal ureteral reconstruction at a single tertiary-care center. From 2010 to 2012, 13 consecutive patients presenting with benign obstruction of mid-/distal ureters were managed with RAUR.
RESULTS: In all cases the operative procedure was undertaken with six-port transperitoneal access, and all procedures were completed robotically. All ureters (left, n=5; right, n=7; bilateral, n=1) were re-implanted in a standard Bricker fashion into the dome of the bladder with (n=8) or without (n=6) a psoas hitch. Catheters were removed 4-11 days postoperatively, and all cystograms were negative for leak. Stents were removed 14-48 days after surgery. All were negative for hydronephrosis. Average follow-up was 10 (range, 2-20) months. There were two grade 1, two grade 2, two grade 3, and no grade 4 or 5 complications in 3 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: RAUR is a safe and effective procedure. Extensive laparoscopic lysis of adhesions represents the primary challenge to an otherwise straightforward minimally invasive surgery. At our institution, RAUR has replaced open ureteral re-implantation as the preferred treatment for benign mid-/distal ureteral stricture disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25978559     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2014.0051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

1.  [Application of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy in ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch].

Authors:  Dong Li; Bao-Jun Wang; Xu Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-05-20

Review 2.  Robot-assisted distal ureteral reconstruction for benign pathology: Current state.

Authors:  Aeen M Asghar; Randall A Lee; Kevin K Yang; Michael Metro; Daniel D Eun
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-11-21

Review 3.  Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction - current status and future directions.

Authors:  Paurush Babbar; Nitin Yerram; Andrew Sun; Sij Hemal; Prithvi Murthy; Darren Bryk; Naveen Nandanan; Yaw Nyame; Maxx Caveney; Ryan Nelson; Ryan Berglund
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction: а systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Konstantin Kolontarev; George Kasyan; Dmitry Pushkar
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 5.  Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Raj P Pal; Anthony J Koupparis
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-08-07

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in adults: A single surgeon experience and literature review.

Authors:  Najib Isse Dirie; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-10-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.