Literature DB >> 25977589

Evaluation of particle resuspension in young children's breathing zone using stationary and robotic (PIPER) aerosol samplers.

Jessica A Sagona1, Stuart L Shalat2, Zuocheng Wang1, Maya Ramagopal3, Kathleen Black4, Marta Hernandez4, Gediminas Mainelis5.   

Abstract

Development of asthma in young children may be associated with high exposure to particulate matter (PM). However, typical stationary samplers may not represent the personal exposure of children ages 3 and younger since they may not detect particles resuspended from the floor as children play, thus reducing our ability to correlate exposure and disease etiology. To address this, an autonomous robot, the Pretoddler Inhalable Particulate Environmental Robotic (PIPER) sampler, was developed to simulate the movements of children as they play on the floor. PIPER and a stationary sampler took simultaneous measurements of particle number concentration in six size channels using an optical particle counter and inhalable PM on filters in 65 homes in New Jersey, USA. To study particle resuspension, for each sampler we calculated the ratio of particle concentration measured while PIPER was moving to the average concentration of particles measured during a reference period when PIPER remained still. For all investigated particle sizes, higher particle resuspension was observed by PIPER compared to the stationary sampler. In 71% of carpeted homes a more significant (at the α = 0.05 level) resuspension of particles larger than 2.5 μm was observed by PIPER compared to the stationary sampler. Typically, particles larger than 2.5 μm were resuspended more efficiently than smaller particles, over both carpeted and bare floors. Additionally, in carpeted homes estimations of PM10 mass from the particle number concentrations measured on PIPER while it was moving were on average a factor of 1.54 higher compared to reference period when PIPER was not moving. For comparison, the stationary sampler measured an increase of PM2.5 mass by a factor of only 1.08 when PIPER was moving compared to a reference period. This demonstrates that PIPER is able to resuspend particles through movement, and provide a better characterization of the resuspended particles than stationary samplers. Accurate measurement of resuspended PM will improve estimates of children's total PM exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PM size fractions; Pretoddler Inhalable Particulate Environmental Robotic sampler; children's exposures to PM; floor type; resuspension; robotic sampling platform

Year:  2015        PMID: 25977589      PMCID: PMC4426999          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Sci        ISSN: 0021-8502            Impact factor:   3.433


  20 in total

1.  Elevated personal exposure to particulate matter from human activities in a residence.

Authors:  Andrea R Ferro; Royal J Kopperud; Lynn M Hildemann
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2004

2.  Particle dose estimation from frying in residential settings.

Authors:  G J Evans; A Peers; K Sabaliauskas
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.770

3.  Profiling transient daytime peaks in urban air pollutants: city centre traffic hotspot versus urban background concentrations.

Authors:  T Moreno; X Querol; A Alastuey; M Viana; W Gibbons
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2009-06-15

4.  A pilot study of the measurement and control of deep dust, surface dust, and lead in 10 old carpets using the 3-spot test while vacuuming.

Authors:  J W Roberts; G Glass; L Mickelson
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: EPA's weight-of-evidence analysis.

Authors:  J Jinot; S Bayard
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Air pollution and respiratory symptoms among children with asthma: vulnerability by corticosteroid use and residence area.

Authors:  Toby C Lewis; Thomas G Robins; Graciela B Mentz; Xiaohui Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee; Xihong Lin; Gerald J Keeler; J Timothy Dvonch; Fuyuen Y Yip; Marie S O'Neill; Edith A Parker; Barbara A Israel; Paul T Max; Angela Reyes
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Development and in-home testing of the Pretoddler Inhalable Particulate Environmental Robotic (PIPER Mk IV) sampler.

Authors:  Stuart L Shalat; Adam A Stambler; Zuocheng Wang; Gediminas Mainelis; Osiloke H Emoekpere; Marta Hernandez; Paul J Lioy; Kathleen Black
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Respiratory effects of indoor particles in young children are size dependent.

Authors:  Ulrich Franck; Olf Herbarth; Stefan Röder; Uwe Schlink; Michael Borte; Ulrike Diez; Ursula Krämer; Irina Lehmann
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Estimating the resuspension rate and residence time of indoor particles.

Authors:  Jing Qian; Andrea R Ferro; Kathleen R Fowler
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.235

10.  Resuspension of indoor aeroallergens and relationship to lung inflammation in asthmatic children.

Authors:  Suresh Raja; Ying Xu; Andrea R Ferro; Peter A Jaques; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 9.621

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of particulate matter exposure estimates in young children from personal sampling equipment and a robotic sampler.

Authors:  Jessica A Sagona; Stuart L Shalat; Zuocheng Wang; Maya Ramagopal; Kathleen Black; Marta Hernandez; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Pyrethroid levels in toddlers' breathing zone following a simulated indoor pesticide spray.

Authors:  Jiaqi Zhou; Gediminas Mainelis; Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields.

Authors:  Hooman Parhizkar; Mark Fretz; Aurélie Laguerre; Jason Stenson; Richard L Corsi; Kevin G Van Den Wymelenberg; Elliott T Gall
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2022-03-11

4.  Crawling-induced floor dust resuspension affects the microbiota of the infant breathing zone.

Authors:  Heidi K Hyytiäinen; Balamuralikrishna Jayaprakash; Pirkka V Kirjavainen; Sampo E Saari; Rauno Holopainen; Jorma Keskinen; Kaarle Hämeri; Anne Hyvärinen; Brandon E Boor; Martin Täubel
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 14.650

5.  Exploring the utility of robots in exposure studies.

Authors:  Elisabeth Feld-Cook; Rahul Shome; Rosemary T Zaleski; Krishnan Mohan; Hristiyan Kourtev; Kostas E Bekris; Clifford P Weisel; Jennifer Mi K Shin
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.563

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.