Pablo García-Hernández1, Belén Prieto2, Eduardo Martínez-Morillo2, Verónica Rodríguez2, Francisco V Álvarez3. 1. Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain pabgaher@gmail.com. 2. Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. 3. Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microbiological culture of cerebrospinal fluid is the gold standard to differentiate between aseptic and bacterial meningitis, but this method has low sensitivity. A fast and reliable new marker would be of interest in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: Interleukin-6, secreted by T cells in response to meningeal pathogens and quickly delivered into cerebrospinal fluid, was evaluated as a marker of acute meningitis. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 150 cerebrospinal fluid samples were analysed by an electrochemiluminescence method, selected according to patient diagnosis: (a) bacterial meningitis confirmed by positive culture (n = 26); (b) bacterial meningitis with negative culture or not performed (n = 15); (c) viral meningitis confirmed by polymerase chain reaction or immunoglobulin G determination (n = 23); (d) viral meningitis with polymerase chain reaction negative or not performed (n = 42); and (e) controls (n = 44). RESULTS: Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 concentration showed significant differences between all pathologic groups and the control group (P < 0.001). As a diagnostic tool for bacterial meningitis, interleukin-6 showed an area under the curve of 0.937 (95% confidence intervals: 0.895-0.978), significantly higher than those of classical biomarkers. An interleukin-6 cutoff of 1418 pg/mL showed 95.5% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity, whereas a value of 15,060 pg/mL showed 63.6% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity, for diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. CONCLUSION: Interleukin-6 measured by electrochemiluminescence method is a promising marker for early differentiation between aseptic and bacterial meningitis. More studies are needed to validate clinical implications for future practice in an emergency laboratory.
BACKGROUND: Microbiological culture of cerebrospinal fluid is the gold standard to differentiate between aseptic and bacterial meningitis, but this method has low sensitivity. A fast and reliable new marker would be of interest in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE:Interleukin-6, secreted by T cells in response to meningeal pathogens and quickly delivered into cerebrospinal fluid, was evaluated as a marker of acute meningitis. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 150 cerebrospinal fluid samples were analysed by an electrochemiluminescence method, selected according to patient diagnosis: (a) bacterial meningitis confirmed by positive culture (n = 26); (b) bacterial meningitis with negative culture or not performed (n = 15); (c) viral meningitis confirmed by polymerase chain reaction or immunoglobulin G determination (n = 23); (d) viral meningitis with polymerase chain reaction negative or not performed (n = 42); and (e) controls (n = 44). RESULTS: Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 concentration showed significant differences between all pathologic groups and the control group (P < 0.001). As a diagnostic tool for bacterial meningitis, interleukin-6 showed an area under the curve of 0.937 (95% confidence intervals: 0.895-0.978), significantly higher than those of classical biomarkers. An interleukin-6 cutoff of 1418 pg/mL showed 95.5% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity, whereas a value of 15,060 pg/mL showed 63.6% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity, for diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. CONCLUSION:Interleukin-6 measured by electrochemiluminescence method is a promising marker for early differentiation between aseptic and bacterial meningitis. More studies are needed to validate clinical implications for future practice in an emergency laboratory.
Authors: Alisa K Pautova; Anastasiia Yu Meglei; Ekaterina A Chernevskaya; Irina A Alexandrova; Natalia V Beloborodova Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-03-04