Literature DB >> 25977241

Safety, efficacy and indications of prescription of maraviroc in clinical practice: Factors associated with clinical outcomes.

Josep M Llibre1, Antonio Rivero2, Jhon F Rojas3, Miguel Garcia Del Toro4, Cristina Herrero5, David Arroyo6, Juan A Pineda7, Juan Pasquau8, Mar Masiá9, Manel Crespo10, José R Blanco11, Santiago Moreno12.   

Abstract

Maraviroc is approved for treatment-experienced HIV+ adults in twice-daily administration. Limited data are available on safety, efficacy and use in routine clinical practice, outside of restrictive clinical trials. This retrospective multicenter (27 centers) study included 667 subjects starting a regimen with maraviroc. The primary endpoint was plasma HIV-RNA <50copies/mL and CD4(+) cell count change at 48 and 96weeks (FDA snapshot analysis). 94.4% had CCR5 tropism (58.3% Trofile™, 29.2% population genotype, and 12% genotyping proviral DNA). Half of the subjects received the drug in scenarios or dosages outside the initial approval. Maraviroc was prescribed for salvage in 346 (51.9%) individuals, as a switch strategy due to toxicity in 135 (38.7%), for immune discordance in 75 (11.2%), and for simplification in 48 (7.2%). After salvage therapy, 223 (64.5%) subjects had HIV-RNA <50copies/mL at 48weeks, and 178 (51.4%) at 96weeks. Darunavir/r was included in 224 (64.7%) subjects and associated with higher rates of virological and immunologic efficacy (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis MSM (OR 2.25; 95%CI 1.29-3.94) and baseline HIV-RNA <100,000copies/mL (OR 1.96; 1.06-3.70) were associated with virological suppression. An increase in CD4(+) counts was seen at 48 and 96weeks in subjects with immune discordance (p<0.001). Maraviroc was used once-daily in 142 (21.3%) subjects overall, and 68 (57.4%) in switch/simplification. No new safety signals were identified. Besides in salvage regimens, maraviroc was frequently used in switch due to toxicity, simplification, and immune discordance. The efficacy in salvage in clinical practice was higher than in phase III clinical trials, likely due to availability of new active drugs in the regimen. These results increase our understanding of the efficacy, safety, and conditions of prescription of maraviroc beyond the initial registrational trials and the early manufacturer pharmacovigilance programs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiretroviral treatment; CCR5 antagonists; CCR5 tropism; Immune discordance; Maraviroc; Salvage treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25977241     DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antiviral Res        ISSN: 0166-3542            Impact factor:   5.970


  4 in total

Review 1.  CCR5 blockade for neuroinflammatory diseases--beyond control of HIV.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin-Blondel; David Brassat; Jan Bauer; Hans Lassmann; Roland S Liblau
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  A central role for glial CCR5 in directing the neuropathological interactions of HIV-1 Tat and opiates.

Authors:  Sarah Kim; Yun Kyung Hahn; Elizabeth M Podhaizer; Virginia D McLane; Shiping Zou; Kurt F Hauser; Pamela E Knapp
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 8.322

3.  High Virologic Failure Rates with Maraviroc-Based Salvage Regimens Among Indian Patients: A Preliminary Analysis-Maraviroc Effectiveness in HIV-1 Subtype C.

Authors:  Sanjay Pujari; Sunil Gaikwad; Vivek Bele; Kedar Joshi; Digamber Dabhade
Journal:  J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec

4.  Clinical use, efficacy, and durability of maraviroc for antiretroviral therapy in routine care: A European survey.

Authors:  Andrea De Luca; Patrizio Pezzotti; Charles Boucher; Matthias Döring; Francesca Incardona; Rolf Kaiser; Thomas Lengauer; Nico Pfeifer; Eugen Schülter; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Maurizio Zazzi; Anna Maria Geretti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.