Literature DB >> 25977128

Development and evaluation of an electronic health record-based best-practice discharge checklist for hospital patients.

Trit Garg1, Jonathan Y Lee, Kambria H Evans, Jonathan Chen, Lisa Shieh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Checklists may help reduce discharge errors; however, current paper checklists have limited functionality. In 2013 a best-practice discharge checklist using the electronic health record (EHR) was developed and evaluated at Stanford University Medical Center (Stanford, California) in a cluster randomized trial to evaluate its usage, user satisfaction, and impact on physicians' work flow.
METHODS: The study was divided into four phases.
RESULTS: In Phase I, on the survey (N = 76), most of the participants (54.0%) reported using memory to remember discharge tasks. On a 0-100 scale, perception of checklists as being useful was strong (mean, 66.4; standard deviation [SD], 21.2), as was interest in EHR checklists (64.5, 26.6). In Phase II, the checklist consisted of 15 tasks categorized by admission, hospitalization, and discharge-planning. In Phase III, the checklist was implemented as an EHR "smart-phrase" allowing for automatic insertion. In Phase IV, in a trial with 60 participating physicians, 23 EHR checklist users reported higher usage than 12 paper users (28.5 versus 7.67, p = .019), as well as higher checklist integration with work flow (22.6 versus 1.67, p = .014), usefulness of checklist (33.7 versus. 8.92, p = .041), discharge confidence (30.8 versus 5.00, p = .029), and discharge efficiency (25.5 versus 6.67, p = .056). Increasing EHR checklist use was correlated with usefulness ( r = .85, p < .001), confidence (r = .81, p < .001), and efficiency (r = .87, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The EHR checklist reminded physicians to complete discharge tasks, improved confidence, and increased process efficiency. This is the first study to show that medicine residents use "memory" as the most common method for remembering discharge tasks. These data reinforce the need for a formalized tool, such as a checklist, that residents can rely on to complete important discharge tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25977128     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41017-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  6 in total

1.  Hospital-Based Physicians' Intubation Decisions and Associated Mental Models when Managing a Critically and Terminally Ill Older Patient.

Authors:  Shannon Haliko; Julie Downs; Deepika Mohan; Robert Arnold; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Usability challenges with electronic health records (EHRs) during prerounding on pediatric inpatients.

Authors:  Jawad Alami; Clare Hammonds; Erin Hensien; Jenan Khraibani; Stephen Borowitz; Martha Hellems; Sara Lu Riggs
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2022-03-08

3.  A meta-model for computer executable dynamic clinical safety checklists.

Authors:  Shan Nan; Pieter Van Gorp; Xudong Lu; Uzay Kaymak; Hendrikus Korsten; Richard Vdovjak; Huilong Duan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Improving Early Discharges With an Electronic Health Record Discharge Optimization Tool.

Authors:  Michael F Perry; Charlie Macias; Juan D Chaparro; Allison C Heacock; Kenneth Jackson; Ryan S Bode
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-05-18

5.  The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study.

Authors:  Angela Keniston; Lauren McBeth; Jonathan Pell; Kasey Bowden; Anna Metzger; Amanda Anthony; John Rice; Marisha Burden; Jamie Nordhagen
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-11-08

6.  Investigating discharge communication for chronic disease patients in three hospitals in India.

Authors:  Claire Humphries; Suganthi Jaganathan; Jeemon Panniyammakal; Sanjeev Singh; Prabhakaran Dorairaj; Malcolm Price; Paramjit Gill; Sheila Greenfield; Richard Lilford; Semira Manaseki-Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.