Literature DB >> 25976635

Evaluation of Baermann apparatus sedimentation time on recovery of Strongylus vulgaris and S. edentatus third stage larvae from equine coprocultures.

Jennifer L Bellaw1, Martin K Nielsen2.   

Abstract

Traditional methods of diagnosing equine Strongylinae infections require culturing feces, sedimenting the culture media in Baermann apparatuses, collecting the sediment, and morphologically identifying recovered third stage larvae. However, this method is plagued by low negative predictive values. This study evaluated sedimentation time within the Baermann apparatus by comparing larval recovery from the traditionally collected sediment, "sediment 1", and from the usually discarded remaining fluid contents, "sediment 2", of the Baermann apparatus after 12, 24, and 48 h. A grand total of 147,482 larvae were recovered and examined. Sedimentation time did not significantly influence total larval recovery. At all three durations, significantly more Cyathostominae and Strongylus vulgaris larvae were covered from sediment 1 than from sediment 2. However, less than 60% of all recovered Strongylus edentatus were recovered from sediment 1. As 95% of S. vulgaris larvae were always recovered from sediment 1, the need for collection and examination of the remaining fluid contents of the Baermann apparatus is obviated when performing coprocultures for diagnosis of S. vulgaris infections, and sedimentation for 12h is adequate. Approximately 70% of Cyathostominae were recovered in sediment 1 at all durations, suggesting that 12h of sedimentation is adequate, although there is a need for future research to evaluate the risk of selection bias at differing sedimentation times among individual cyathostomin species. In contrast to S. vulgaris, collecting and examining the entire contents of the Baermann apparatus may be necessary when an increased diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value is desired in diagnosing S. edentatus infections as only 38-61% of larvae were recovered from sediment 1 portion of the Baermann apparatus. This information will allow researchers and practitioners to make more informed decisions in choosing appropriate larval recovery techniques, balancing recovery, time, and effort.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baermann; Coproculture; Larvae; Sedimentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25976635     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  5 in total

1.  Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture - method comparison and occurrence assessment.

Authors:  A Kaspar; K Pfister; M K Nielsen; C Silaghi; H Fink; M C Scheuerle
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Parasite Occurrence and Parasite Management in Swedish Horses Presenting with Gastrointestinal Disease-A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ylva Hedberg-Alm; Johanna Penell; Miia Riihimäki; Eva Osterman-Lind; Martin K Nielsen; Eva Tydén
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Parasite dynamics in untreated horses through one calendar year.

Authors:  Ashley E Steuer; Haley P Anderson; Taylor Shepherd; Morgan Clark; Jessica A Scare; Holli S Gravatte; Martin K Nielsen
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Clinical features and treatment response to differentiate idiopathic peritonitis from non-strangulating intestinal infarction of the pelvic flexure associated with Strongylus vulgaris infection in the horse.

Authors:  Ylva Hedberg-Alm; Eva Tydén; Lena-Mari Tamminen; Lisa Lindström; Karin Anlén; Maria Svensson; Miia Riihimäki
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Parasites in Horses Kept in A 2.5 Year-Round Grazing System in Nordic Conditions without Supplementary Feeding.

Authors:  Eva Tydén; Anna Jansson; Sara Ringmark
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.