S Bulchandani1, E Watts2, A Sucharitha3, D Yates1, K M Ismail1,4. 1. Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK. 2. Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 3. The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK. 4. The Birmingham Centre of Women's and Children's Health, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genital tract trauma is common with vaginal births and is associated with significant morbidity, particularly with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Debate continues regarding the effectiveness of perineal support during childbirth in reducing the risk of trauma. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to assess the effect of routine 'hands on'/manual perineal support (MPS) during childbirth, versus ad hoc/no perineal support ('hands off/poised'), on the risk and degree of perineal trauma. SEARCH STRATEGY: This review is registered on PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014007058). We searched the CENTRAL, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and OVIDs midwifery and infant care databases (from inception to December 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA: Published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies (NRSs) evaluating any 'hands on' perineal support technique during childbirth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion, data extraction, and methodological quality. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third reviewer. MAIN RESULTS: We included five RCTs and seven NRSs in the review. Meta-analysis of RCTs did not demonstrate a statistically significant protective effect of MPS on the risk of OASIS (three studies, 6647 women; relative risk, RR 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.32-3.36; statistical test for heterogeneity I(2) = 71%). Meta-analysis of NRSs showed a significant reduction in the risk of OASIS with MPS (three studies, 74,744 women; RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.40-0.50; I(2) = 32%). CONCLUSION: Current evidence is insufficient to drive change in practice. An adequately powered randomised trial with an efficient design to evaluate the complex interventions adopted as part of MPS policies, ensuring controlled childbirth, is urgently needed.
BACKGROUND:Genital tract trauma is common with vaginal births and is associated with significant morbidity, particularly with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Debate continues regarding the effectiveness of perineal support during childbirth in reducing the risk of trauma. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to assess the effect of routine 'hands on'/manual perineal support (MPS) during childbirth, versus ad hoc/no perineal support ('hands off/poised'), on the risk and degree of perineal trauma. SEARCH STRATEGY: This review is registered on PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014007058). We searched the CENTRAL, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and OVIDs midwifery and infant care databases (from inception to December 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA: Published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies (NRSs) evaluating any 'hands on' perineal support technique during childbirth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion, data extraction, and methodological quality. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third reviewer. MAIN RESULTS: We included five RCTs and seven NRSs in the review. Meta-analysis of RCTs did not demonstrate a statistically significant protective effect of MPS on the risk of OASIS (three studies, 6647 women; relative risk, RR 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.32-3.36; statistical test for heterogeneity I(2) = 71%). Meta-analysis of NRSs showed a significant reduction in the risk of OASIS with MPS (three studies, 74,744 women; RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.40-0.50; I(2) = 32%). CONCLUSION: Current evidence is insufficient to drive change in practice. An adequately powered randomised trial with an efficient design to evaluate the complex interventions adopted as part of MPS policies, ensuring controlled childbirth, is urgently needed.
Authors: Tony Bazi; Satoru Takahashi; Sharif Ismail; Kari Bø; Alejandra M Ruiz-Zapata; Jonathan Duckett; Dorothy Kammerer-Doak Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-03-12 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Hadil Ali-Masri; Sahar Hassan; Erik Fosse; Kaled M Zimmo; Mohammed Zimmo; Khaled M K Ismail; Åse Vikanes; Katariina Laine Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Mahad Ali; Richard Migisha; Joseph Ngonzi; Joy Muhumuza; Ronald Mayanja; Jolly Joe Lapat; Wasswa Salongo; Musa Kayondo Journal: Obstet Gynecol Int Date: 2020-05-14
Authors: Posy Bidwell; Ranee Thakar; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; James M Harris; Louise Silverton; Alexandra Hellyer; Robert Freeman; Edward Morris; Vivienne Novis; Nick Sevdalis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 2.692