Literature DB >> 25976346

Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example.

Tania Laity1, Shawn W Laffan2, Carlos E González-Orozco3, Daniel P Faith4, Dan F Rosauer5, Margaret Byrne6, Joseph T Miller7, Darren Crayn8, Craig Costion9, Craig C Moritz5, Karl Newport1.   

Abstract

Phylodiversity measures summarise the phylogenetic diversity patterns of groups of organisms. By using branches of the tree of life, rather than its tips (e.g., species), phylodiversity measures provide important additional information about biodiversity that can improve conservation policy and outcomes. As a biodiverse nation with a strong legislative and policy framework, Australia provides an opportunity to use phylogenetic information to inform conservation decision-making. We explored the application of phylodiversity measures across Australia with a focus on two highly biodiverse regions, the south west of Western Australia (SWWA) and the South East Queensland bioregion (SEQ). We analysed seven diverse groups of organisms spanning five separate phyla on the evolutionary tree of life, the plant genera Acacia and Daviesia, mammals, hylid frogs, myobatrachid frogs, passerine birds, and camaenid land snails. We measured species richness, weighted species endemism (WE) and two phylodiversity measures, phylogenetic diversity (PD) and phylogenetic endemism (PE), as well as their respective complementarity scores (a measure of gains and losses) at 20 km resolution. Higher PD was identified within SEQ for all fauna groups, whereas more PD was found in SWWA for both plant groups. PD and PD complementarity were strongly correlated with species richness and species complementarity for most groups but less so for plants. PD and PE were found to complement traditional species-based measures for all groups studied: PD and PE follow similar spatial patterns to richness and WE, but highlighted different areas that would not be identified by conventional species-based biodiversity analyses alone. The application of phylodiversity measures, particularly the novel weighted complementary measures considered here, in conservation can enhance protection of the evolutionary history that contributes to present day biodiversity values of areas. Phylogenetic measures in conservation can include important elements of biodiversity in conservation planning, such as evolutionary potential and feature diversity that will improve decision-making and lead to better biodiversity conservation outcomes. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Conservation planning; Diversity; Phylogenetic diversity; Phylogenetic endemism; Phylogeny; Policy; Species

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25976346     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Comparative phylogeography clarifies the complexity and problems of continental distribution that drove A. R. Wallace to favor islands.

Authors:  Brett R Riddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Exploring genetic diversity and Population structure of five Aegilops species with inter-primer binding site (iPBS) markers.

Authors:  Ferhat Kizilgeci; Bora Bayhan; Aras Türkoğlu; Kamil Haliloglu; Mehmet Yildirim
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 3.  Biodiversity analysis in the digital era.

Authors:  John La Salle; Kristen J Williams; Craig Moritz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods.

Authors:  Teo Delić; Peter Trontelj; Michal Rendoš; Cene Fišer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Australasian Virtual Herbarium: Tracking data usage and benefits for biological collections.

Authors:  David J Cantrill
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups.

Authors:  Carlos E González-Orozco; Brent D Mishler; Joseph T Miller; Shawn W Laffan; Nunzio Knerr; Peter Unmack; Arthur Georges; Andrew H Thornhill; Dan F Rosauer; Bernd Gruber
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Endemism patterns are scale dependent.

Authors:  Barnabas H Daru; Harith Farooq; Alexandre Antonelli; Søren Faurby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Reconciling the concepts and measures of diversity, rarity and originality in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Anna Kondratyeva; Philippe Grandcolas; Sandrine Pavoine
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2019-03-12

9.  Phylogenetic endemism of the orchids of Megamexico reveals complementary areas for conservation.

Authors:  Brandon E Gutiérrez-Rodríguez; Marilyn Vásquez-Cruz; Victoria Sosa
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2022-03-25

10.  Investigating the effect of forestry on leaf-litter arthropods (Algonquin Park, Ontario, Canada).

Authors:  M Alex Smith; Amanda Boyd; Amelia Chan; Simonne Clout; Paulson des Brisay; Sarah Dolson; Thanushi Eagalle; Sean Espinola; Aaron Fairweather; Sydney Frank; Christopher Fruetel; Cristina Garrido Cortes; James Hall; Chris Ho; Eryk Matczak; Sandra McCubbin; Megan McPhee; Kate A Pare; Kelsie Paris; Ellen Richard; Morgan Roblin; Cassandra Russell; Ryan Snyder; Carolyn Trombley; Tyler Schmitt; Caitlin Vandermeer; Connor Warne; Natasha Welch; Chelsie Xavier-Blower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.