Literature DB >> 25974932

Variance Estimation for Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic PET.

Jonathan B Moody, Venkatesh L Murthy, Benjamin C Lee, James R Corbett, Edward P Ficaro.   

Abstract

The estimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) by (13)N-ammonia or (82)Rb dynamic PET typically relies on an empirically determined generalized Renkin-Crone equation to relate the kinetic parameter K1 to MBF. Because the Renkin-Crone equation defines MBF as an implicit function of K1, the MBF variance cannot be determined using standard error propagation techniques. To overcome this limitation, we derived novel analytical approximations that provide first- and second-order estimates of MBF variance in terms of the mean and variance of K1 and the Renkin-Crone parameters. The accuracy of the analytical expressions was validated by comparison with Monte Carlo simulations, and MBF variance was evaluated in clinical (82)Rb dynamic PET scans. For both (82)Rb and (13)N-ammonia, good agreement was observed between both (first- and second-order) analytical variance expressions and Monte Carlo simulations, with moderately better agreement for second-order estimates. The contribution of the Renkin-Crone relation to overall MBF uncertainty was found to be as high as 68% for (82)Rb and 35% for (13)N-ammonia. For clinical (82)Rb PET data, the conventional practice of neglecting the statistical uncertainty in the Renkin-Crone parameters resulted in underestimation of the coefficient of variation of global MBF and coronary flow reserve by 14-49%. Knowledge of MBF variance is essential for assessing the precision and reliability of MBF estimates. The form and statistical uncertainty in the empirical Renkin-Crone relation can make substantial contributions to the variance of MBF. The novel analytical variance expressions derived in this work enable direct estimation of MBF variance which includes this previously neglected contribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25974932     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2432678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  8 in total

1.  The utility of 82Rb PET for myocardial viability assessment: Comparison with perfusion-metabolism 82Rb-18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Keri M Hiller; Benjamin C Lee; Alexis Poitrasson-Rivière; James R Corbett; Richard L Weinberg; Venkatesh L Murthy; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with 82Rb PET.

Authors:  Adrian F Ocneanu; Robert A deKemp; Jennifer M Renaud; Andy Adler; Rob S B Beanlands; Ran Klein
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters.

Authors:  P Chilra; S Gnesin; G Allenbach; M Monteiro; J O Prior; L Vieira; J A Pires Jorge
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-02-15

4.  Consistent tracer administration profile improves test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Adrian Ocneanu; Jennifer M Renaud; Maria C Ziadi; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Effect of PET-CT misalignment on the quantitative accuracy of cardiac 15O-water PET.

Authors:  Jonny Nordström; Hendrik J Harms; Tanja Kero; Maryam Ebrahimi; Jens Sörensen; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with (82)Rb: Validation with (15)O-water using time-of-flight and point-spread-function modeling.

Authors:  Mary Germino; Jim Ropchan; Tim Mulnix; Kathryn Fontaine; Nabeel Nabulsi; Eric Ackah; Herman Feringa; Albert J Sinusas; Chi Liu; Richard E Carson
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.138

7.  (82)Rb PET imaging of myocardial blood flow-have we achieved the 4 "R"s to support routine use?

Authors:  Robert A deKemp; Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.138

8.  Effect of temporal sampling protocols on myocardial blood flow measurements using Rubidium-82 PET.

Authors:  S S Koenders; J D van Dijk; P L Jager; M Mouden; A G Tegelaar; C H Slump; J A van Dalen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.872

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.