Literature DB >> 25974770

Craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants polyether ether ketone with computer-assisted planning.

Oscar J Manrique1, Frank Lalezarzadeh, Erez Dayan, Joseph Shin, Daniel Buchbinder, Mark Smith.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of bony craniofacial defects requires precise understanding of the anatomic relationships. The ideal reconstructive technique should be fast as well as economical, with minimal donor-site morbidity, and provide a lasting and aesthetically pleasing result. There are some circumstances in which a patient's own tissue is not sufficient to reconstruct defects. The development of sophisticated software has facilitated the manufacturing of patient-specific implants (PSIs). The aim of this study was to analyze the utility of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) PSIs for craniofacial reconstruction. We performed a retrospective chart review from July 2009 to July 2013 in patients who underwent craniofacial reconstruction using PEEK-PSIs using a virtual process based on computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. A total of 6 patients were identified. The mean age was 46 years (16-68 y). Operative indications included cancer (n = 4), congenital deformities (n = 1), and infection (n = 1). The mean surgical time was 3.7 hours and the mean hospital stay was 1.5 days. The mean surface area of the defect was 93.4 ± 43.26 cm(2), the mean implant cost was $8493 ± $837.95, and the mean time required to manufacture the implants was 2 weeks. No major or minor complications were seen during the 4-year follow-up. We found PEEK implants to be useful in the reconstruction of complex calvarial defects, demonstrating a low complication rate, good outcomes, and high patient satisfaction in this small series of patients. Polyether ether ketone implants show promising potential and warrant further study to better establish the role of this technology in cranial reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25974770     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Cost Analysis for In-house versus Industry-printed Skull Models for Acute Midfacial Fractures.

Authors:  Lyfong S Lor; Dominic A Massary; Scotty A Chung; Philip J Brown; Christopher M Runyan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-26

Review 2.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Finite element method for the design of implants for temporal hollowing.

Authors:  Federica Ruggiero; David Dunaway; Curtis Budden; Luke Smith; Noor Ul Owase Jeelani; Silvia Schievano; Juling Ong; Alessandro Borghi
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-12-18

4.  Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Ashraf; Nabeel Choudhary; Usman Ahmad Kamboh; Muhammad Asif Raza; Kashif Ali Sultan; Naseeruddin Ghulam; Syed Shahzad Hussain; Naveed Ashraf
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  Craniofacial Reconstruction by a Cost-Efficient Template-Based Process Using 3D Printing.

Authors:  Bilal Msallem; Fabian Beiglboeck; Philipp Honigmann; Claude Jaquiéry; Florian Thieringer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-11-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.