| Literature DB >> 25973977 |
Selene Báez1, Agustina Malizia2, Julieta Carilla2, Cecilia Blundo2, Manuel Aguilar3, Nikolay Aguirre4, Zhofre Aquirre4, Esteban Álvarez5, Francisco Cuesta6, Álvaro Duque7, William Farfán-Ríos8, Karina García-Cabrera8, Ricardo Grau9, Jürgen Homeier10, Reynaldo Linares-Palomino3, Lucio R Malizia11, Omar Melo Cruz12, Oriana Osinaga13, Oliver L Phillips14, Carlos Reynel3, Miles R Silman8, Kenneth J Feeley15.
Abstract
General patterns of forest dynamics and productivity in the Andes Mountains are poorly characterized. Here we present the first large-scale study of Andean forest dynamics using a set of 63 permanent forest plots assembled over the past two decades. In the North-Central Andes tree turnover (mortality and recruitment) and tree growth declined with increasing elevation and decreasing temperature. In addition, basal area increased in Lower Montane Moist Forests but did not change in Higher Montane Humid Forests. However, at higher elevations the lack of net basal area change and excess of mortality over recruitment suggests negative environmental impacts. In North-Western Argentina, forest dynamics appear to be influenced by land use history in addition to environmental variation. Taken together, our results indicate that combinations of abiotic and biotic factors that vary across elevation gradients are important determinants of tree turnover and productivity in the Andes. More extensive and longer-term monitoring and analyses of forest dynamics in permanent plots will be necessary to understand how demographic processes and woody biomass are responding to changing environmental conditions along elevation gradients through this century.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25973977 PMCID: PMC4431807 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Distribution of the 63 permanent forest plots used in this study.
North-central Andes plots were only used for analyses of tree turnover.
Environmental and demographic forest variables in the North-Central Andes, and North-Western Argentina.
| Parameter | North-Central Andes Mean ± SE (Min-Max) n = 45 | North-Western Argentina Mean ± SE (Min-Max) n = 18 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.74 | -25.15 |
| (11.26 –-13.11) | (-22.27 –-26.76) | |
|
| 2620 | 1084 |
| (1007–5977) | (925–1150) | |
|
| 12.22 | 6.43 |
| (0.9–22.6) | (4.2–8.5) | |
|
| 5.43 | 0.60 |
| (0.05–16.76) | (0.32–1.01) | |
|
| 1.88 | 2.42 |
| (0.25–3.21) | (1.18–5.54) | |
|
| 0.41 | 0.41 |
| (0.12–0.92) | (0.27–0.71) | |
|
| 1.86 | 0.33 |
| (0.45–4.16) | (0.14–0.74) | |
|
| 0.31 | 0.55 |
| (-2.44–2.86) | (-1.09–3.48) |
a n = 32 North-Central Andean plots
Loadings and variation explained in two Principal Components Analysis using five environmental variables recorded in 63 permanent plots, and for a subset of 32 permanent plots located in the North-Central Andes.
| All plots (n = 63) | North-Central Andean plots (n = 32) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis 1 | Axis 2 | Axis 1 | Axis 2 | |
|
| 0.83683 | -0.07509 | 0.76207 | -0.34325 |
|
| 0.10485 | 0.92060 | -0.94232 | -0.15800 |
|
| 0.76785 | 0.14083 | -0.01932 | 0.94545 |
|
| 0.75961 | 0.44616 | 0.09185 | 0.74545 |
|
| 0.64159 | -0.74929 | 0.96992 | 0.06443 |
|
| 45% | 33% | 48% | 32% |
Fig 2Classification of 32 North-Central Andean permanent plots.
Classification according to the plot’s scores in the first two factors of a Principal Component Analysis.
Descriptive statistics of the geographic, environmental, and demographic variables of Higher Montane Humid Forests (HMHF) and Lower Montane Moist Forests (LMMF).
| LMMF Mean ± SE (Min-Max) n = 16 | HMHF Mean ± SE (Min-Max) n = 16 |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1453.6 ± 263.3 | 2146.2 ± 247.1 | 3.7 | 0.10 | 0.064 |
| (57–2970) | (60–3940) | ||||
|
| 14.36 ± 1.35 | 9.57 ± 1.26 | 6.6 | 0.18 |
|
| (7–22.6) | (0.9–21.1) | ||||
|
| 5.75 ± 1.05 | -6.47 ± 1.74 | 35.8 | 0.54 |
|
| (-3.99–10.67) | (-13.11–5.58) | ||||
|
| 2095.5 ± 227.1 | 3630.4 ± 260.4 | 19.7 | 0.39 |
|
| (1007–3677) | (1403–5977) | ||||
|
| 4.15 ± 0.6 | 7.07 ± 1.3 | 4.3 | 0.11 | 0.067 |
| (0.6–8.6) | (0.6–16.7) | ||||
|
| 0.84 ± 0.26 | -0.19 ± 0.25 | 7.9 | 0.22 |
|
| (-0.71–2.86) | (-2.44–1.11) | ||||
|
| 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.489 |
| (0.23–0.56) | (0.12–0.75) | ||||
|
| 2.23 ± 0.18 | 1.32 ± 0.11 | 18.0 | 0.38 |
|
| (1.48–4.16) | (0.45–2.28) | ||||
|
| 1.71 ± 0.23 | 0.99 ± 0.13 | 6.8 | 0.18 |
|
| (0.47–3.45) | (0.00–2.10) | ||||
|
| 2.27 ± 0.29 | 2.24 ± 0.30 | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.959 |
| (0.77–5.39) | (0.52–4.74) |
Statistically significant results of ANOVAs comparing the two forest groups are presented in bold.
Fig 3Linear regressions of forest demographic variables as a function of the first two factors of a Principal Component Analysis.
Summary of the results of Linear Regression analyses using PCA axes as predictive variables of forest demography for plots in North-Central, and North-Western Argentina.
| PCA 1 | PCA 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables |
| Estimate |
|
| Estimate |
| |
|
| Tree turnover (% yr-1) | 0.003 | -0.04 | ns | 0.19 | -0.21 | 0.003 |
| Tree growth (m2 yr-1) | 0.01 | 0.09 | ns | 0.12 | -0.04 | 0.047 | |
| Relative tree growth (% yr-1) | 0.01 | 0.05 | ns | 0.32 | -0.38 | <0.001 | |
| Basal area change (% yr-1) | 0.09 | 0.39 | ns | 0.08 | -0.31 | ns | |
|
| Tree turnover (% yr-1) | 0.08 | -0.05 | ns | 0.01 | -0.24 | ns |
| Tree growth (m2 yr-1) | 0.13 | -0.34 | ns | 0.29 | 1.68 | 0.021 | |
| Relative tree growth (% yr-1) | 0.04 | 0.15 | ns | 0.05 | 0.25 | ns | |
| Basal area change (% yr-1) | 0.22 | -0.06 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.15 | ns | |
Fig 4Linear regressions of forest demographic variables in North-Western Argentina.
Basal area net change and individual tree growth and as a function of the first two factors of a Principal Component Analysis.