| Literature DB >> 25972884 |
Rosana López1, Ricard Brossa2, Luis Gil1, Pilar Pita1.
Abstract
The photosynthesis source-sink relationship in young Pinus canariensis seedlings was modified by stem girdling to investigate sprouting and cambial activity, feedback inhibition of photosynthesis, and stem and root hydraulic capacity. Removal of bark tissue showed a trade-off between sprouting and diameter growth. Above the girdle, growth was accelerated but the number of sprouts was almost negligible, whereas below the girdle the response was reversed. Girdling resulted in a sharp decrease in whole plant transpiration and root hydraulic conductance. The reduction of leaf area after girdling was strengthened by the high levels of abscisic acid found in buds which pointed to stronger bud dormancy, preventing a new needle flush. Accumulation of sugars in leaves led to a coordinated reduction in net photosynthesis (AN) and stomatal conductance (gS) in the short term, but later (gS below 0.07 mol m(-2) s(-1)) AN decreased faster. The decrease in maximal efficiency of photosystem II (FV/FM) and the operating quantum efficiency of photosystem II (ΦPSII) in girdled plants could suggest photoprotection of leaves, as shown by the vigorous recovery of AN and ΦPSII after reconnection of the phloem. Stem girdling did not affect xylem embolism but increased stem hydraulic conductance above the girdle. This study shows that stem girdling affects not only the carbon balance, but also the water status of the plant.Entities:
Keywords: ABA; chlorophyll fluorescence; gas exchange; hydraulic conductance; source–sink regulation; sprouting
Year: 2015 PMID: 25972884 PMCID: PMC4413673 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 4Diameter growth vs. accumulated number of sprouts in control and girdled plants in the base of the stem (B), below the girdle (L) and above the girdle (U) 48 d.a.g.
Mean values (±SE) for aboveground dry mass, leaf area, and maximum leaf specific transpiration measured 56 days after girdling (d.a.g.) and at the end of the experiment (145 d.a.g.), leaf mass per area and relative water content of control (C) and girdled Pinus canariensis.
| C | GF | GW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry mass (g) 56 d.a.g. | 75.8 ± 7.1a | 49.0 ± 6.9b | 54.0 ± 5.2b |
| Dry mass (g) 145 d.a.g. (block 2/3) | 70.7 ± 5.5a/49.8 ± 3.1b | 60.6 ± 6.5ab/44.9 ± 4.7b | 56.2 ± 4.4ab/27.0 ± 6.3c |
| Leaf area (m2) 56 d.a.g. | 0.51 ± 0.05a | 0.36 ± 0.05b | 0.33 ± 0.03b |
| Leaf area (m2) 145 d.a.g. (block 2/3) | 0.35 ± 0.04a/0.31 ± 0.04a | 0.33 ± 0.03a/0.32 ± 0.04a | 0.26 ± 0.03b/0.11 ± 0.04c |
| Leaf specific trans (g m-2 day-1) 56 d.a.g. (block 1) | 797 ± 85a | 670 ± 46a | 764 ± 63a |
| Leaf specific trans (g m-2 day-1) 145 d.a.g. (block 2/3) | 763 ± 79a/855 ± 56a | 532 ± 58b/651 ± 76ab | 197 ± 29c/210 ± 46c |
| LMA (g m-2)145 d.a.g. | 115.4 ± 4.0b | 115.5 ± 4.5b | 126.7 ± 4.1a |
| RWC 145 d.a.g. | 0.95 ± 0.05a | 0.96 ± 0.05a | 0.79 ± 0.03b |
Mean values (±SE) for chlorophyll content (Chl), chlorophyll a:chlorophyll b ratio (Chl) and carotenoids (Carot) 35, 50, and 140 days after girdling (d.a.g.) in control (C), fine girdled (GF), and wide girdled (GW) Pinus canariensis.
| 35 d.a.g. | 50 d.a.g. | 140 d.a.g. | 35 d.a.g. | 50 d.a.g. | 140 d.a.g. | 35 d.a.g. | 50 d.a.g. | 140 d.a.g. | |
| Chla+b (mg g-1) | 1.68 ± 0.1a | 1.67 ± 0.1a | 1.56 ± 0.2a | 1.32 ± 0.1b | 1.50 ± 0.1a | 1.34 ± 0.2a | 1.23 ± 0.1b | 0.95 ± 0.1b | 0.83 ± 0.2b |
| Chla:b | 2.57 ± 0.2a | 2.60 ± 0.1a | 3.36 ± 0.5a | 2.20 ± 0.2ab | 2.21 ± 0.1b | 2.67 ± 0.5ab | 1.98 ± 0.1b | 2.19 ± 0.1b | 1.84 ± 0.4b |
| Carot (mg g-1) | 0.28 ± 0.02a | 0.30 ± 0.02a | 0.28 ± 0.03a | 0.21 ± 0.02b | 0.25 ± 0.02a | 0.22 ± 0.03a | 0.20 ± 0.02b | 0.19 ± 0.01b | 0.08 ± 0.02c |
Mean values (±SE) for wood density (WD), hydraulic conductance (kh), specific hydraulic conductivity (KS), leaf specific conductivity (LSC), root conductance (kroot) and leaf specific root hydraulic conductance (LScroot) above (U) and below (L) the girdle 56 days after girdling (d.a.g.) in control (C), fine girdled (GF), and wide girdled (GW) Pinus canariensis.
| C | GF | GW | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U | L | U | L | U | L | |
| WD (g cm-3) | 0.42 ± 0.02c | 0.44 ± 0.02bc | 0.44 ± 0.02bc | 0.47 ± 0.02ab | 0.45 ± 0.01bc | 0.48 ± 0.01a |
| kh (Kg s-1 MPa-1 × 10-6) | 28.1 ± 6.1ab | 43.2 ± 6.0a | 33.7 ± 6.0ab | 27.7 ± 6.2ab | 41.0 ± 4.4a | 27.2 ± 4.2b |
| KS (Kg m-1 s-1 MPa-1) | 0.66 ± 0.07a | 0.71 ± 0.07a | 0.67 ± 0.08a | 0.71 ± 0.09a | 0.79 ± 0.06a | 0.66 ± 0.06a |
| LSC (Kg m-1 s-1 MPa-1 × 10-6) | 56 ± 4c | 85 ± 12bc | 119 ± 14a | 90 ± 10ab | 120 ± 10a | 78 ± 9bc |
| kroot (Kg s-1 MPa-1 × 10-6) | 49.2 ± 7.1a | 25.5 ± 7.9b | 23.1 ± 5.0b | |||
| LScroot (Kg m-2 s-1 MPa-1 × 10-6) | 98.5 ± 14.2a | 70.5 ± 11.5b | 67.1 ± 10.8b | |||
Mean concentration (±SE) of abscisic acid (ABA), abscisic acid glucose ester (ABA-GE), and jasmonic acid (JA) in xylem, needles, buds and phloem above (U) and below (L) the girdle 145 days after girdling (d.a.g.) in control (C), fine girdled (GF), and wide girdled (GW) Pinus canariensis.
| C | GF | GW | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABA (nmol g-1) | ABA-GE (nmol g-1) | JA (nmol g-1) | ABA (nmol g-1) | ABA-GE (nmol g-1) | JA (nmol g-1) | ABA (nmol g-1) | ABA-GE (nmol g-1) | JA (nmol g-1) | |
| Buds | 0.58 ± 0.2c | 1.16 ± 0.6c | 0.30 ± 0.1ab | 0.28 ± 0.1c | 0.40 ± 0.1c | 0.18 ± 0.0b | 16.40 ± 4.1b | 23.11 ± 5.6a | 0.41 ± 0.1ab |
| Needles | 0.57 ± 0.1c | 12.22 ± 0.2b | 0.62 ± 0.2ab | 0.61 ± 0.1c | 12.78 ± 0.5b | 0.44 ± 0.2ab | 6.73 ± 2.2b | 18.72 ± 4.9ab | 0.21 ± 0.1b |
| Xylem | 0.19 ± 0.0c | 0.13 ± 0.0c | 0.19 ± 0.0b | 1.06 ± 0.7c | 0.32 ± 0.1c | 0.31 ± 0.1ab | 32.76 ± 4.2a | 0.61 ± 0.1c | 0.36 ± 0.2ab |
| Phloem U | 0.24 ± 0.1c | 1.03 ± 0.3 c | 0.31 ± 0.1ab | 0.39 ± 0.0c | 1.46 ± 0.2c | 0.26 ± 0.1ab | 11.32 ± 4.0b | 4.09 ± 1.4b | 0.77 ± 0.3a |
| Phloem L | 0.16 ± 0.0c | 0.46 ± 0.1c | 0.36 ± 0.1ab | 0.19 ± 0.1c | 0.52 ± 0.1c | 0.23 ± 0.0ab | 0.22 ± 0.2c | 0.78 ± 0.2c | 0.28 ± 0.1ab |